
By David Bray
Broadcaster Magazine
Were you lying to me then or are you lying to me now?
That is the question I have had posed to me time and again when it comes to Diary vs. PPM methodology. It is a fair question given that the results from each format are markedly different.
I put the question to Jim McLeod, President of BBM, in my recent podcast interview.
| 11 November 2009
- A full service advertising agency that specializes in the electronic media and alternative media.
- Lean and muscular... clients are assured of hands on service by recognized senior specialists.
- We deliver... results oriented analysis. Extensive research backs up our plans.
- Award Winning Creative that delivers results.
- Extensive inside industry contracts are second to none. Total knowledge of all major markets ensures relevant plans.
- Unsurpassed media contacts combined with strong strategic planning delivers optimal public relations management.
- Cutting edge technology in terms of research and production are employed.
- Studio facilities/engineers on site. Work is not shopped out, thus insuring better production costs and overall control.
- Specializing in designing tactical executions.
- Compensation is dependent upon performance!
| 05 November 2009
It's the problem that has survivalists up in arms, while they get down to building bunkers. They call it Y2K. I call it The Trouble with 2000. this month I'm taking a look at possible repercussions for broadcasters.| 05 November 2009
Born in theThe rights, requirements and restrictions of Canadian radio broadcasters have long differed from those born in the land of Bruce Springsteen. Similarly, the limited number of licenses granted as compared to the U.S. (where, I understand, sending in box tops can secure you a license) has resulted in the unique character of Canadian radio. This article is intended as a brief update on the current state (province?) of affairs.
| 05 November 2009
Oddly enough, things seem to be heating up as we come out of the summer and into the fall. This is a brief look at who made waves in the summer radio BBM, as well as an overview of some significant changes on the radio industry horizon.| 05 November 2009
Few would argue that the quality of creative has a significant impact on any radio campaign. Production values and engineering ingenuity help to ensure that the advertisers (or station's) aural image breaks through. Still, the production equipment is often the weak link in a radio station’s arsenal. Operations with fine sales, programming and on-air talent are hesitant to upgrade out-of-date analogue equipment because the expenditure will bear no direct relationship to revenue or ratings. The truth is that the sound and image of any station is highly dependent upon production. This is a brief look at reasonable ways to upgrade your sound at a time when everyone’s budget is tight.| 05 November 2009
With the release of the fall radio BBM's, some broadcasters face a long winter waiting for a reprieve from a bad book. In fact, the six month wait for the Spring BBM (to be released June 13) poses a real financial challenge for those who have to live with a "bad bounce".This book is the final one that focuses solely on demographics, GRPs can R.I.P.
Spring 1996 will mark the debut of single source product usage/lifestyle information. When cross referenced with demographic information this should usher in a new era of opportunities for niche oriented stations.
| 05 November 2009
When perusing recent radio programming and audience trends one might say that, in the words of Alan Jackson, Canada's gone country. At the very least, Canada has made some significant overtures in the direction of new country.In the recent Fall 1995 BBM, the country format saw audience gains in Toronto, Hamilton, Vancouver, Winnipeg, Calgary, St. John's, Peterborough, et al. The format has traditionally inspired rabid loyalty and excellent hours tuned, but used to fare less well in terms of overall cume. Full coverage was its forte, with central area numbers in some instances lagging behind. Aspects of this pattern are starting to change.
| 05 November 2009
While radio certainly has a venerable heritage and currently maintains a position as the medium for those on the move, a new breed of broadcaster is starting to rev up for the information highway. A variety of concepts are merging at ever increasing speeds. If you are not faint of heart, stick your neck out and you'll find that we are approaching something very exciting. The two dominant topics currently prompting discussion are digital radio and use of the Internet. Exploration indicates how closely related these two matters are.It is essential that broadcasters and advertisers unite in order to facilitate the implementation of new technologies. Some cynics say that they've heard it all before -- a reference to the lobbying fiasco of AM stereo. I prefer to think that we've learned our lesson -- consensus and cooperation will ultimately benefit us all.
Starting this year, the CRTC will begin hearing applications (from existing licence holders) for new digital positions. These interference free signals will be broadcast with CD quality sound in a new frequency band (1452-1492 Mhz.)
Installation costs (roughly estimated at $80,000 per signal) and operating costs will be substantially lower than for their analog counterparts. Digital compression techniques are rapidly improving, opening up new transmission possibilities.
In addition to conventional broadcast services, related items such as weather/news information, addressable messages and geopositioning services can be offered in digital form by broadcast license holders. Advertisers can be offered the option of providing phone numbers and product details in digital form to interested listeners. This array of possible services affords the broadcaster new sorely needed revenue sources.
Digital signals will be offered parallel and concurrent with analog signals for the next decade. The key to success appears to lie with enlisting the support of auto manufacturers. The inclusion of digital receivers in new cars is the only sure way of securing listener support. Land based transmission will begin this year, while satellite based transmission is scheduled to be in place no later than 2004.
It is becoming clear that the concept of international broadcasting holds immense promise. In addition to the digital transmission described above, look for broadcasting on the Internet to become widespread over the next few years.
Shortly, FM quality signals will be broadcast over telephone lines via the World Wide Web to computers around the world. With the use of the RealAudio players (download from www.realaudio.com) and a relatively fast modem (28,800 baud) listeners can tune into special programming events or regular programming from stations in Sydney, Hong Kong or Santa Monica. Given that the number of hits on a Web site can be accounted for precisely, these stations will be able to record the exact number of impressions in a manner never before possible.
In addition, many stations in Canada have been setting up their own Web sites for promotional and research purposes. This appears to be especially true of younger skewed rock stations (Q107 and CFNY-FM in Toronto, CFOX-FM and Z95.3 in Vancouver, CHOM-FM in Montreal, CITI-FM and Q94FM in Winnipeg among others) and information/news based stations. Given that 52 per cent of Web users are 16 to 34 and 64.5 per cent of Web users are male, the importance of the net as a rock promotion vehicle becomes apparent. It is also interesting to note that total Internet usage in the U.S. and Canada is equivalent to the total playback of rented video tapes. Thirty seven million people in the U.S. and Canada currently have access to the Net. This number is growing at an astonishing rate. Stations have used their sites for listener requests, determining attitudes toward specific cuts and listener promotions. Some enterprising stations include and merchandise links to advertiser sites.
The Net offers a series of other advantages. It will become the most quick and efficient way of communicating with national clients. Sound can be attached to communiqués and sales pitches. Creative will be stored in digital form and trafficked via the Web more cost effectively than this has been possible with older methods. Sound clips, interviews and various other sonic resources will be accessible from central sites. For example, check out the radio links in the Yahoo net directory. You can download everything from classic radio shows of the 30's and 40's to current clips. Also, a central pool of ad copy for broadcasters (check out www.medianet.org) can prove to be an effective resource.
Those broadcasters who are taking the trouble to quickly get up to speed on the information highway will be the ones who will win the race. By merging traditional strengths with new technologies, the radio medium appears to be ready to take off.
| 05 November 2009
Executives from a coalition of publishing and recording associations have recently charged that broadcasters have been less than supportive of Canadian talent in Canada. Let's take a look at radio's response.| 05 November 2009
The dawn of a new era in radio research is upon us. A variety of sweeping changes promise to revitalize the radio industry and open up opportunities for progressive, proactive buyers and sellers. The number and complexity of new initiatives seem to warrant examination and clarification. After all, in order to help radio make money , the research must first make sense.The incorporation of single source product usage/lifestyle questions into BBM diaries (to be unveiled in the June release of the Spring 1996 survey) is, by far, the most significant development in years. Timeliness, consistency and reliable trending will be established by having the questions appear in every survey in all markets. (Especially noteworthy is the fact that this comes at no extra cost to member stations.) Shedding light on the complexion of radio's targeted audience will certainly allow for more proficient selling and buying, not to mention and overall increase in revenue for the medium. Now, reach/frequency runs against the real target group (cross referencing product usage with demographic information) will be a possibility. Clients are willing to pay if you can demonstrate what the product (radio) is worth.
| 05 November 2009
Inevitably with the release of each new radio ratings book, the issue of accountability arises. It is a dangerous temptation to attempt a trend correction by lynching the morning show, ousting a programme director or toasting the sales manager.Far too often, a discussion of accountability turns into a reactive assessment of who is to blame. More than ever, it is important that members of the radio industry in Canada use the exemplary tools now at their disposal to proactively promote the targeting ability of the medium. Radio has proven that it can deliver results. It's time to stand up and be counted. Clients need to be shown that raido will enthusiastically shoulder its share of marketing challenges.
| 05 November 2009
More questions than answers on why CBC really needs another Toronto FM Licence.The recent action taken by the Department of Canadian Heritage (intervening on behalf of the CBC) threatened to abort the Toronto and Montreal FM licence application processes. This represents one of the more significant precedents in the history of Canadian Broadcasting. Among other things, it could have rendered the primary licensing authority, the CRTC, virtually impotent. Now is the time to examine the facts surrounding this important issue.
Let's look at what has happened to date. The CRTC asked that broadcasters register notice of application to obtain the remaining FM frequencies in Toronto and Montreal. There are approximately 17 applicants for the frequency in Toronto and eight for the frequency in Montreal. so far, so good. Each applicant proceeded to spend up to $500,000 on the market analyses, technical briefs, etc. required for their bids. That is par for the course.
What happened next was that the rules changed. Legally speaking, it may be within the rights of the Canadian Heritage Minister to exercise her power by directing that the FM frequencies be reserved for the CBC. This would pre-empt private broadcasters from participating in the process. The Ministry suggested just that, forcing the CRTC to stay the two public hearings pending a cabinet direction. Why did Sheila Copps and her protégés wait until late in the process to raise this issue? If this was to be the reaction to recommendations contained in the Juneau Report, why was it not tabled in a timely manner? Why was the CRTC not informed? One might suggest that it bid for the frequency in an open competition.
Let's examine the CBC's reasons for desiring the new FM dial positions. Essentially, the CBC wishes to transfer its AM programming to FM. The states reason is the desire for a better signal with improved coverage. The CBC is troubled by the fact that AM signal is blocked by office towers. In fact, Toronto's 740AM ahs one of the best AM signal patterns available. The CBC AM hours tuned are well over double those of the FM. In Montreal, the AM also out performs the FM by almost 2 to 1.
It seems clear that a negative message about the AM band is being sent out by the government. Such a position is wholly inappropriate. AM talk stations continue to thrive across North America. CFRB in Toronto (one of Canada's most listened to radio stations) delivers an outstanding audience with a signal inferior to that of 740AM. CJAD in Montreal continues to deliver sizeable audiences. The fact is that talk does not benefit from the frequencies above 10kHz that FM would deliver (since the human voice doesn't use those high frequencies). In that CBC AM is predominantly talk, assigning an FM band would appear to be a waste.
Given that the industry is in the process of upgrading all analog signals (AM and FM ) to digital, it is a mystery as to why CBC would bear huge capital expenditures replacing AM transmitters with FM facilities which then must shortly be replaced by digital facilities.
Not surprisingly, broadcasters reacted with outrage. Michael McCabe (president and CEO of the Canadian Association of Broadcasters) officially states his grave concern's over the government's position. Angry applicants considered law suits if their lobbying against Heritage Canada's position died not succeed.
Private broadcasters who generate jobs and bolster the economy are becoming impatient with the favoritism shown the CBC. In Toronto alone, the CBC currently boasts seven media outlets (English and French). Is this not sufficient? Certainly no private broadcaster would be permitted that kind of ownership.
After a substantial amount of lobbying and extensive press coverage, the federal Cabinet put the whole process back in the arena of the CRTC. It would seem that the heat that has been generated left politicians unwilling to back the position taken by Heritage Canada. The date for final submissions was pushed back to facilitate, among other things, the preparation of CBC's application.
The Canadian Association of Broadcasters and licence applicants have expressed relieve. Still, this unsettling affair has left broadcasting in Canada with a dubious precedent, the specter of future intervention, and one might say, a disturbing heritage.
| 05 November 2009
Without question, the cornerstones of most successful broadcast enterprises are the cooperative attitudes and approaches used when building and managing cohesive teams. Though the premise may seem terribly simple, putting it into practice is anything but.| 05 November 2009
Listen. You can hear a buzz in the air. It's being caused by a new Toronto FM frequency (99.1) about to be allocated by the CRTC. this is the last possible site on the dial and a small group of applicants are hotly pursuing it. all of the major broadcast conglomerates currently have a Toronto license, effectively prohibiting them from joining the fray. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the contest and the issues being discussed. I should mention that I have been working with one of the applicants, All Toronto. Still the purpose of this piece is not to rank the submissions or to suggest which one is the most deserving.The applicants break out into two basic categories. About half focus on improving the overage area and/or signal strength of existing stations, while the remainder are putting forward new formats for which they see a programming hole in the market. Cultural contributions and niche programming for minorities play a significant role in the arguments put forward by the latter group.
The application with the highest profile and greatest degree of controversy is undoubtedly the CBC. Their goal is to move the popular AM740 to the FM Band. They site problems with the signal strength of their current configuration as a rationale for the move. The currently have two other FM signals in Toronto (one English and one French). Earlier in the process, the Canadian Heritage Minister considered exercising her power to direct that the FM frequencies be reserved for the CBC. This would preempt private broadcasters from participating in the process.
The CRTC were, in fact, forced to stay two public hearings pending a Cabinet direction. Ultimately, due to an ensuing furor, the cabinet chose not to pursue this option, leaving the CBC to argue the merits of its application in an open competition. Given FM's limited full coverage reach as compared to AM, the CBC has also requested additional FM licenses for outlying communities.
Also in the hunt for a better signal is the winner of the last licence granted, Rawlco. They are seeking to upgrade CISS-FM which is hampered by the relatively low power (13,000 watts) of its current position (92.5). In recent years there have been no groups more effective at licence applications. They certainly have the CRTC's ear.
Looking to upgrade its position is Hot 103.5's Dufferin Communications. This dance station (one of two in the market) is currently very active in Toronto although its licence is Orangeville-based.
the owners of another Toronto area station, CHWO, are seeking to establish a nostalgia format.
When it comes to submissions touting a unique cultural contribut8ion, none have garnered as much talk as that of Denham Jolley and Milestone Communications. Their proposed "world urban" format, a sort of inner city dance, is being promoted as addressing the needs of the local black community. This is quite a sensitive issue, especially since Milestone lost out last time to the other end of the musical spectrum, country.
All Toronto is headed up by Doug Bingley of Rock 95 in Barrie. Also in the group are well known broadcasters Roy Hennessy and Sandy Davis. they are looking to establish a rhythmic CHR, a new music hit station which the market has lacked since the shift of AM640. This group has made the largest pledge (in dollars) toward Canadian talent development. the interesting cultural angle here is the commitment to fund and foster a national aboriginal network on the sideband.
Another well known broadcaster, J. Robert Wood (ex of the CHUM group) is putting his money on dance. In the other corner is Durham Radio with its bid for another country format.
Lastly there is Ron Dixon and Vancouver's Radio One (CKST) who are proposing an Adult contemporary / World Music format. Ron recently made an unsuccessful bid for a Vancouver license.
It is being said that the license will got to the group demonstrating the greatest contribution to culture. This is particularly true since this is the last band, and thus the last opportunity to provide distinct groups with a new voice.
That having been said, the decision becomes complicated. Which group, if any, is the most deserving? Aboriginals or blacks? Perhaps a world music that covers a variety of bases? Or Sheila Copps' first choice, the CBC, with its national mandate to bond Canadians together.
Stay tuned for further developments as applicants rev up their computers and flex their presentation skills for the CRTC. Soon we'll have an answer. Perhaps then this buzzing in my ears will stop.
| 05 November 2009
In their quest to increase radio revenues, broadcasters have traditionally sold radio short in one particular area; creative. Few would argue that the quality of creative has a significant impact on any radio campaign. Production values and engineering ingenuity help to ensure that the advertisers (or station's) aural image breaks through. Why then has ad creative traditionally been positioned as being a no charge throw in to retail advertisers.| 05 November 2009
The lifting of the FM hits restriction will have a huge impact on programmers, advertisers and listeners.It seems that the squares have come full circle. After years of almost impenetrable programming regulations that amounted to advanced algebra, the usually stodgy CRTC has turned FM radio back into a much less regulated forum. Up until now, FM stations were constrained and limited to 49% hits. Effectively, and somewhat perversely, this meant that listeners were prevented from hearing some of their favorite songs... or at least hearing them as much as they would like.
| 05 November 2009
In the beginning, there was CHUM. For young people growing up in Toronto during the 50's, 60's and 70's, 1050 CHUM was something of a religion. One that defined pop music and pop culture. For many of us there is a certain reverence for the songs that are interwoven with memories of the era. There was an energy, innocence and enthusiasm that has given way to more cynical times. As Bob Seger once said, "I wish I didn't know now what I didn't know then." On a tough day, it's easy to feel like that.In 1957 Allan Waters launched hit radio in Canada with the debut of CHUM. It is difficult to estimate the full impact of the station's influence in the years that followed. For Canadian artists, making the hallowed FHUM Chart meant that their careers were taking off. Listeners enthusiastically picked up their free copies of the chart at record stores. Even after all these years, those same charts are prized collector's items; icons that map out the memories of our youth. for fun, check out the charts on CHUM's searchable web site (www.1050chum.com.)
The station consistently drew a large, diverse and loyal audience. The baby boom generation, comprising a significant percentage of the overall population, were reaching adolescence and tuning in to the station for the sound-track to their youth. DJ's like Jungle Jay Nelson (who is currently being honoured in Cleveland's Rock and Roll Hall of Fame) were household names. Clients lined up for promotional considerations and airtime.
By the late 1970's and the 1980's the FM band made a dramatic impact on AM. Transistor radios gave way to boom boxes and car stereo systems. Classic rock and new wave emerged as viable music formats. Young listeners tended to be audiophiles who preferred FM stereo with its increased fidelity and frequency range. CHUM finally came to a crossroads. In 1986 it was time to grow up.
Ultimately, the rationale for moving to an oldies format was financial in nature. The baby boom bulge in the population could still be counted on for the station's financial wellbeing. Now that they had grown older, give them the music of their youth on the station that they remembered fondly. This 35-54 demo with high discretionary income is attractive to advertisers. This audience will tune to a mono signal in order to hear the songs they love. The hit restrictions on the FM band prevented the oldies format from cropping up there. In fact, the new CRTC ruling continues to protect oldies AM stations by limiting the hit songs released prior to 1981 that FM plays.
CHUM, along with CHUM-FM, remains the company's flagship station in Canada. CHUM is one of the few financially viable music-based stations remaining on the AM band in Canada's major markets. The strong trend on that band has been toward talk, following the U.S. lead. CHUM Ltd. itself has been developing a syndicated talk network. Still its flagship station continues to crank out the tunes, presenting a unique alternative to Toronto's over-crowded talk on AM.
From the outset, the Waters team (Allan and son Jim) displayed a distinctive approach to sales. While other stations were volume driven, giving preferential rates to larger customers, CHUM remained very sympathetic to smaller clients, feeling that they too were valued and deserved the same rates as the big boys. The Waters also felt that their product was worth a certain amount regardless of the client's target demo, and as such were reluctant to cut outrageous deals. Lastly, the Waters' pride in each of their properties was exemplified by the fact that both the AM and FM were strongly promoted and sold in a standalone fashion as opposed to following the combo approach adopted by other broadcasters.
On the national sales side, CHUM has maintained, as Tim Stelle put it, "a great working partnership" for 30 years with Major Market Broadcasters.
MMB was formed in 1967, with Allan Waters purchasing a 15 per cent share, which he maintains to this day. National rep shops have come and gone. Consolidation has swept a good many of them aside, but MMB keeps rolling along, currently representing about 80 stations across Canada.
The current approach to sales is dramatically different from days gone by when we bought and sold spots. Straight GRPs are about to go the way of the dinosaur. Simple demo runs are not sufficient to give you a sales edge in an era when everyone has their own computer. Reps must be knowledgeable about the format, attuned to promotional considerations, and well versed in the qualitative/lifestyle data that better defines a station's audience and its ability to strategically target a client's consumer.
What does the future hold for 1050 CHUM? It is impossible to speculate. Digital will, over the next decade, change the playing field. CRTC deregulation will also impact on market complexions. Why worry about tomorrow today while were' having so much fun remembering yesterday?
I have to admit, it is a little difficult to be objective about CHUM's early history. Given that this venerable station is celebrating its 40th birthday, I prefer to reflect on fond memories. Now, if I can only remember where I put my collection of old CHUM charts.
| 05 November 2009
The polities of national versus local concerns have long proved to be divisive. Little wonder that in the world of radio sales this rift continues to separate less successful from more profitable operations.It is generally held that radio sales are approximately75-80 per cent local and 20-25 per cent national. the difficulty arises when we try to define what constitutes a national account. Moreover, who gets the right to service that account, a local sales executive or a national rep shop? Throw in the topic of commission and this discussion gets ugly. The losers are inevitably the client (who is caught in the middle), the station and the medium as a whole with its image further tarnished. The position that defines any business with a storefront as a local account has long ago lost any credence. Infighting is rampant. At a time when the medium sorely needs and deserves proactive selling, the battle isn't even making it out the front door.
| 05 November 2009
There are a variety of voices vying for attention at the latest CRTC radio hearings. The question is who's worth listening to? Let's try to sift through the issues the key players and the possible implications of change. The primary items for consideration are Cancon regulations and duopolies. Let's start with the latter.A review of broadcast ownership policies is being prompted in the U.S. experience with duopolies. Currently in Canada, one corporation is limited to ownership of a maximum of one AM and one FM station (of the same language) in each market. The exception is Windsor where the CHUM group was permitted to acquire all four stations (2 AM and 2 FM) in order to survive against Detroit competition. Shaw has an ownership position in two Toronto area FM stations, CFNY-FM and FM108, giving them a strangle-hold on younger listeners. Technically FM108 is in Burlington. Secondly, the ownership is held by, among others, Shaw principals such as Terry Strain and Hal Blackadar as opposed to all being held by Shaw itself.
The only real option currently available to Canadian broadcasters in need of a more financially efficient management approach is a LMA (local management agreement). Such arrangements have been made in, for example, Sudbury, Winnipeg, North Bay and Saskatoon. there, some management and sales functions of different stations were combined with certain conditions. Each licensee retains ownership of their station assets and maintains a separate programming, news, and senior management staff.
| 05 November 2009
In this era of added value, we're constantly being asked "how much is it worth to you?" The ‘It’ in question could be a promo / liner, a new morning host, or a divorce (seemingly quite a popular item with overworked radio execs).This month I did a bit of shopping around in an attempt to analyze value systems in the world of radio.
Why has payola never been a factor in Canada as compared to the U.S.A.? Why don't we have hordes of independent promo people waving wads of cash in return for a playlist add? I would like to think it is because of our moral superiority. The truth may be that it doesn’t' pay enough. It isn't worth it for those who are criminally inclined. As one major market programme director said to me, "Canada isn't big enough. I was offered 50 bucks once".
Of course when you wade into the grey area of contra, the stories are legend. Sadly, Revenue Canada doesn't appreciate poetic license when it comes to bookkeeping practices.
Speaking of building and renovations, there is another area that doesn't quite stand up to closer inspection - "paper hanging." I've been told many times that "that doesn’t' take place here anymore". How is it then that happy to help out salespeople at certain sold out stations will give desperate buyers perfectly timed phone calls. "We've just had a cancellation." You can hear the implication oozing toward you... how much is it worth to you?
| 05 November 2009
As the recently released census figures indicate, the face of Canada's population is rapidly changing. As we approach the millennium, much of the business community is ill prepared to address the new complexion of marketing opportunities. Those that don't face up to the new reality will be quickly left behind. The truth is, niche or multicultural marketing can translate into increased profits.Many of us come from liberal arts backgrounds where political correctness has us constantly stutter stepping to keep from putting the proverbial foot in the mouth. God forbid we mention anyone's religion, cultural heritage, sex or sexual preference, lest we be coloured prejudiced. It was assumed (if all went well) that society would become one huge happy homogeneous melting pot. Then something happened to muddy the picture's reality.
It has become impossible to ignore the fact that cultural background significantly affects our attitudes, not to mention our lifestyles and purchasing patterns.
| 05 November 2009
Dear Diary: We've been keeping you for quite some time now but we've become a little concerned that some of the stories you've been telling us are less than accurate.
In the world of radio measurement in Canada, we've been forced to court the BBM diary since radio revenues are married to its figures. You can dally with Angus Reid, Birth or other suitors, but you must eventually come back to BBM.
The problem is, of course, that the diary methodology brings with it baggage that can weigh down the results. In this issue I want to take a look at the problems facing the diary and the promising alternatives which are looming on the horizon.
Every methodology has its own set of built in biases. The diary consistently under reports Men 18-24, much to the chagrin of rock and CHR stations. The poor response rates for that demo indicate an entrenched reluctance among young men to "put it in writing".
Additionally the fact that diaries are not rostered may favour better known stations. Promotion campaigns are geared to cementing call letters and slogans in diary keeper's minds. Is secondary or peripheral tuning being accurately accounted for? After testing a rostered diary, BBM concluded that for the additional expense and effort involved, repose rates and accuracy were not significantly improved.
Diaries also have proved to be consistently deficient in capturing the habits of multilingual listeners. These respondents are particularly uncomfortable with having to provide a written response in English. As the multicultural nature of our society becomes more vibrant, this group of consumers becomes increasingly difficult to ignore.
Few would argue that passive metering systems if properly implemented, offer us the best hope for the future. Relying on people's memories for the reporting of tuning habits is so problematic that -- I forget what I was going to say. At any rate, the experience of watching diary respondents recount their activates --- when, where and how they filled in the books --- is more than a little entertaining.
The first passive system to get up and running is Mobiltrak. It is currently available only in Toronto (where it has been tested prior to moving into U.S. markets). This system electronically measures tuning in passing cars. Electronic Measurement Units are placed along busy thoroughfares where tens of thousands of car radios can be monitored in a day. when thinking about the value of in car tuning measurement to advertisers, consider the fact that 98 per cent of shoppers drive to stores and 90 per cent of shoppers listen to the radio on the way to making a purchase.
Mobiltrak offers timely (daily) measurement with huge sample sizes and unerring accuracy, given that the respondents don't have to do anything.
Geographical areas can be limited (e.g. Scarborough) so that destination retailers can look only at cars passing through their buying area. Still, the downside is not insubstantial. Demos can't be broken out.
There is no qualitative / product usage data. Lastly the system only covers FM tuning, ignoring AM patrons. This measurement methodology must be viewed as a complimentary system.
With all this discussion on the relative merits of different methodologies, it is interesting to note that the results reported for Howard Stern's launch on Q107 in Toronto very closely reflected the A12+ numbers which were eventually reported in BBM. Is it possible that the diary isn't so bad after all?
Different passive systems are currently being developed in Switzerland, Germany and the U.S.A. Both Radiocontrol and Infratest Burke are on the verge if implementing promising systems which involve participants wearing watches (isn't that a sing of the times?) which pick up audible radio broadcasts in the listener's vicinity. The data is decoded through the comparison of captured waveforms with those of the broadcasting stations. When combined with a questionnaire to get further demo and qualitative data, these systems provide a vastly improved measurement system. I'll let the cynics decide whether or not their projected implementation over the next couple of years is overly optimistic.
The Personal Portable Meter (what happened to the 4 P's?) is still being developed by Arbitron in the U.S. This system is somewhat more complex in that it involves broadcasters encoding their signals. The pocket-sized meters are carried by listeners and docked nightly for decoding. BBM entered into an agreement with Arbitron a few years back to share in the development of this product. After being highly touted, implementation hasn't proceeded as quickly as expected.
When we get do get true passive measurement what can we expect? We'll probably see higher levels for occasional stations and unplanned listening stations, off peak hours and out of home tuning which have in the past relied most heavily on respondents' memories. Taking recall out of the equation will undoubtedly add up to a more accurate reflection of overall tuning patterns.
Dear Diary: I guess we'll be keeping you for a while yet. But when it comes to change, the writing is on the wall.
| 05 November 2009
Even in this digital age, the tables keep turning. For the record (or at least the Cancon CD), the CRTC has once again changed the playing surface. After careful consideration and a substantial amount of lobbying, our friends in Ottawa have passed two new rulings which will dramatically affect the broadcast community. The complex question that must once again be asked after examining the new bill is who is going to pay? Let me get out my looking glass.| 05 November 2009
Good ones soar but turkeys don't fly. That was the hard lesson learned by Les Nessman of WKRP in Cincinnati concerning radio promotions. The medium of choice when it comes to great promotions has historically been radio. I thought I'd take a brief look at some past campaigns as well as ways in which to better target an initiative.I have always marveled at some on-air announcers facility with numbers.
Imagine my astonishment as I sat in the booth witnessing the jock answer calls with.. You’re the 239th caller... you're the 537th caller... congratulations you're the 1007th caller! Who needs a computer for computations? This is RADIO.
Of course numbers have long played a major role in promotions, especially those digits that correspond to the dial position in question. Whether it's a dollar amount or the 999 greatest songs of all time, it's important to reinforce that dial position in the listener's mind in case a diary finds its way into their hands. Preferably, listeners should be so conditioned that jotting down the number in question is an involuntary response. It doesn't hurt if they always answer the phone with a passionate "I love Hot75.3" Grandma won't mind.
In the age of added value, there is an ever increasing demand for sales promotions. This makes sense, since it is an area in which the medium excels.
If they're properly handled, station and sales promotions can meld. Just imagine a world without conflict; the programme director giving knowing winks and a slap on the back to the sales manager (N.B.: beware of sexual harassment).
There is no reason why a well targeted promotion can't satisfy both the listener and the advertiser while maintaining the basic integrity of the programme.
A first step in designing a promotion should be an analysis of the station's listenership profile. Too often we rush out in search of the big idea without thinking it through. The BBM qualitative data is a great place to start. Should we really have a ski team for a station with the majority of listeners over 55?
Closely examine the recreational habits, purchasing patterns and attitudinal traits of your core listenership. Give them what they want and need, not what you think is a neat idea.
There have been a number of memorable promotions over the years. The most successful are those that generate talk in the market. One example is the Mystery Money Man put on by CKLW-FM in Windsor. A man dressed in a white tuxedo pulled up in his limousine to various locations including grocery stores, bars, and a soup kitchen. Without ever identifying himself, he would shout "We all need more" and hand out $100 bills. This mystery man generated extensive coverage from all media, including competitive radio stations. When the man finally sent out a note offering to reveal himself at a given place and time, he was greeted by a crowd of thousands who were told he was promoting MORE94. The total bill for the promotion was a mere $18,000.
There have been a few spectacular house giveaways. The first I know of, at CHED, generated 250,000 entries in a market of 650,000. Just last year, one at Z95.3 in Vancouver threw B.C. Tel into a frenzy.
Others like the $58,000 Goal at CKY can generate great news stories. Three times in 4 years, CKY paid out $58,000 for a goal scored into a small slot from the opposing blue line. While Lloyds of London was not amused, shows like David Letterman were, and they aired the clip. Here's a tip: photograph and videotape events and send them to the media for slow news days. Don't wait for them to come and cover it.
Other talk generators were Mike Cooper's record sit on a Ferris wheel for CHUM and Neil Hedley's month long sit on a billboard as part of 105.3 Kool-FM's Poster Boy campaign to benefit the United Way. There have been a number of great Christmas promotions (e.g. CISS-FM's Toy Mountain) which serve a good cause and deliver positive image association.
66CFR (a gold base station) had a tremendous success when it rented out the Saddledome, brought in the Beach Boys, and gave away all the tickets. They won the hearts of existing and potential listeners. This promotion was talked about in Calgary for years after the concert.
An important consideration when developing an idea is whether you are targeting your existing core listenership in order to improve hours tuned or looking to expand your base with a cume generator. A number of promotions targeting in-office tuning have very successfully generated huge hours tuned numbers. Set the dial and leave it. Take a look at CHFI-FM's success with this approach.
Controversy (i.e. Howard Stern) is a great way to generate press, talk and cume. The goal is holding the audience after Howard signs off. Also, how do you continue to generate a furor book after book?
One of the top promotions of all time wasn't flashy, but was consistently effective. Rawlco's Mugs & Kisses has been potent in market after market across the country. In one morning, CISS-FM gave out 25,000 mugs to people getting off the Go Train. The mugs continue to serve as ongoing billboards in thousands of offices across the country.
When it comes to prize giveaways, it's important to keep in mind that only about 6% of listeners participate. Your contest should be entertaining listening for the other 94%.
Turkeys don't fly. If you do the research and make sure you're feeding your listeners something geared to their tastes, your promotion will take wing.

President Gary Slaight is one of the driving forces behind the policies that characterize Standard. His father, Allan Slaight, purchased the group in 1985 and son, Gary, joined him in 1987. In recent years, Gary has overseen the day to day dealing of the firm's radio division.
Yes, the blackout, while causing countless problems, somehow reminded me of how special radio can be. How, with its immediacy and local character, the medium plays a unique role in our lives. This doesn't, in any way, denigrate the vital daily contribution of television, print and the internet. It's just that when I turned to those familiar radio stations I felt connected and in touch. Caller after caller offered updates and moment to moment anecdotes. Rather than seeming like some grand synopsis of the situation, it all seemed very personal. I felt like I could call in at any time and join the conversation. It was real drama with no artificiality. This was a group of neighbours setting aside pretensions and speaking openly with one another. The sense of community spirit was palpable.
Where do I turn? That may have been the refrain coming from many of Erin Davis’ faithful listeners after she left CHFI-FM, but we now have an answer. Starting on Tuesday Sept. 7, in what will surely be a perfect fit, she will be co-hosting the morning
In today’s age of consolidation, competition between broadcasters is hotter than ever.