By David Bray
Broadcaster Magazine

Were you lying to me then or are you lying to me now?

That is the question I have had posed to me time and again when it comes to Diary vs. PPM methodology. It is a fair question given that the results from each format are markedly different.

I put the question to Jim McLeod, President of BBM, in my recent podcast interview.

Read more...

  • A full service advertising agency that specializes in the electronic media and alternative media.
  • Lean and muscular... clients are assured of hands on service by recognized senior specialists.
  • We deliver... results oriented analysis. Extensive research backs up our plans.
  • Award Winning Creative that delivers results.
  • Extensive inside industry contracts are second to none. Total knowledge of all major markets ensures relevant plans.
  • Unsurpassed media contacts combined with strong strategic planning delivers optimal public relations management.
  • Cutting edge technology in terms of research and production are employed.
  • Studio facilities/engineers on site. Work is not shopped out, thus insuring better production costs and overall control.
  • Specializing in designing tactical executions.
  • Compensation is dependent upon performance! 
It's the problem that has survivalists up in arms, while they get down to building bunkers.  They call it Y2K.  I call it The Trouble with 2000.  this month I'm taking a look at possible repercussions for broadcasters.

Born in the U.S.A. Canada.
The rights, requirements and restrictions of Canadian radio broadcasters have long differed from those born in the land of Bruce Springsteen.  Similarly, the limited number of licenses granted as compared to the U.S. (where, I understand, sending in box tops can secure you a license) has resulted in the unique character of Canadian radio.  This article is intended as a brief update on the current state (province?) of affairs.

Oddly enough, things seem to be heating up as we come out of the summer and into the fall.  This is a brief look at who made waves in the summer radio BBM, as well as an overview of some significant changes on the radio industry horizon.

Few would argue that the quality of creative has a significant impact on any radio campaign.  Production values and engineering ingenuity help to ensure that the advertisers (or station's) aural image breaks through.  Still, the production equipment is often the weak link in a radio station’s arsenal.  Operations with fine sales, programming and on-air talent are hesitant to upgrade out-of-date analogue equipment because the expenditure will bear no direct relationship to revenue or ratings.  The truth is that the sound and image of any station is highly dependent upon production.  This is a brief look at reasonable ways to upgrade your sound at a time when everyone’s budget is tight.

With the release of the fall radio BBM's, some broadcasters face a long winter waiting for a reprieve from a bad book.  In fact, the six month wait for the Spring BBM (to be released June 13) poses a real financial challenge for those who have to live with a "bad bounce".

This book is the final one that focuses solely on demographics, GRPs can R.I.P.

Spring 1996 will mark the debut of single source product usage/lifestyle information.  When cross referenced with demographic information this should usher in a new era of opportunities for niche oriented stations.




When perusing recent radio programming and audience trends one might say that, in the words of Alan Jackson, Canada's gone country.  At the very least, Canada has made some significant overtures in the direction of new country.

In the recent Fall 1995 BBM, the country format saw audience gains in Toronto, Hamilton, Vancouver, Winnipeg, Calgary, St. John's, Peterborough, et al.  The format has traditionally inspired rabid loyalty and excellent hours tuned, but used to fare less well in terms of overall cume.  Full coverage was its forte, with central area numbers in some instances lagging behind.  Aspects of this pattern are starting to change.

While radio certainly has a venerable heritage and currently maintains a position as the medium for those on the move, a new breed of broadcaster is starting to rev up for the information highway.  A variety of concepts are merging at ever increasing speeds.  If you are not faint of heart, stick your neck out and you'll find that we are approaching something very exciting.  The two dominant topics currently prompting discussion are digital radio and use of the Internet.  Exploration indicates how closely related these two matters are.

It is essential that broadcasters and advertisers unite in order to facilitate the implementation of new technologies.  Some cynics say that they've heard it all before -- a reference to the lobbying fiasco of AM stereo.  I prefer to think that we've learned our lesson -- consensus and cooperation will ultimately benefit us all.

Starting this year, the CRTC will begin hearing applications (from existing licence holders) for new digital positions.  These interference free signals will be broadcast with CD quality sound in a new frequency band (1452-1492 Mhz.)

Installation costs (roughly estimated at $80,000 per signal) and operating costs will be substantially lower than for their analog counterparts.  Digital compression techniques are rapidly improving, opening up new transmission possibilities.

In addition to conventional broadcast services, related items such as weather/news information, addressable messages and geopositioning services can be offered in digital form by broadcast license holders.  Advertisers can be offered the option of providing phone numbers and product details in digital form to interested listeners.  This array of possible services affords the broadcaster new sorely needed revenue sources.

Digital signals will be offered parallel and concurrent with analog signals for the next decade.  The key to success appears to lie with enlisting the support of auto manufacturers.  The inclusion of digital receivers in new cars is the only sure way of securing listener support.  Land based transmission will begin this year, while satellite based transmission is scheduled to be in place no later than 2004.

It is becoming clear that the concept of international broadcasting holds immense promise.  In addition to the digital transmission described above, look for broadcasting on the Internet to become widespread over the next few years.

Shortly, FM quality signals will be broadcast over telephone lines via the World Wide Web to computers around the world.  With the use of the RealAudio players (download from www.realaudio.com) and a relatively fast modem (28,800 baud) listeners can tune into special programming events or regular programming from stations in Sydney, Hong Kong or Santa Monica.  Given that the number of hits on a Web site can be accounted for precisely, these stations will be able to record the exact number of impressions in a manner never before possible.

In addition, many stations in Canada have been setting up their own Web sites for promotional and research purposes.  This appears to be especially true of younger skewed rock stations (Q107 and CFNY-FM in Toronto, CFOX-FM and Z95.3 in Vancouver, CHOM-FM in Montreal, CITI-FM and Q94FM in Winnipeg among others) and information/news based stations.  Given that 52 per cent of Web users are 16 to 34 and 64.5 per cent of Web users are male, the importance of the net as a rock promotion vehicle becomes apparent.  It is also interesting to note that total Internet usage in the U.S. and Canada is equivalent to the total playback of rented video tapes.  Thirty seven million people in the U.S. and Canada currently have access to the Net.  This number is growing at an astonishing rate.  Stations have used their sites for listener requests, determining attitudes toward specific cuts and listener promotions.  Some enterprising stations include and merchandise links to advertiser sites.

The Net offers a series of other advantages.  It will become the most quick and efficient way of communicating with national clients.  Sound can be attached to communiqués and sales pitches.  Creative will be stored in digital form and trafficked via the Web more cost effectively than this has been possible with older methods.  Sound clips, interviews and various other sonic resources will be accessible from central sites.  For example, check out the radio links in the Yahoo net directory.  You can download everything from classic radio shows of the 30's and 40's to current clips.  Also, a central pool of ad copy for broadcasters (check out www.medianet.org) can prove to be an effective resource.

Those broadcasters who are taking the trouble to quickly get up to speed on the information highway will be the ones who will win the race.  By merging traditional strengths with new technologies, the radio medium appears to be ready to take off.

Executives from a coalition of publishing and recording associations have recently charged that broadcasters have been less than supportive of Canadian talent in Canada.  Let's take a look at radio's response.

The dawn of a new era in radio research is upon us.  A variety of sweeping changes promise to revitalize the radio industry and open up opportunities for progressive, proactive buyers and sellers.  The number and complexity of new initiatives seem to warrant examination and clarification.  After all, in order to help radio make money , the research must first make sense.

The incorporation of single source product usage/lifestyle questions into BBM diaries (to be unveiled in the June release of the Spring 1996 survey) is, by far, the most significant development in years.  Timeliness, consistency and reliable trending will be established by having the questions appear in every survey in all markets.  (Especially noteworthy is the fact that this comes at no extra cost to member stations.)  Shedding light on the complexion of radio's targeted audience will certainly allow for more proficient selling and buying, not to mention and overall increase in revenue for the medium.  Now, reach/frequency runs against the real target group (cross referencing product usage with demographic information) will be a possibility.  Clients are willing to pay if you can demonstrate what the product (radio) is worth.


Inevitably with the release of each new radio ratings book, the issue of accountability arises.  It is a dangerous temptation to attempt a trend correction by lynching the morning show, ousting a programme director or toasting the sales manager.

Far too often, a discussion of accountability turns into a reactive assessment of who is to blame.  More than ever, it is important that members of the radio industry in Canada use the exemplary tools now at their disposal to proactively promote the targeting ability of the medium.  Radio has proven that it can deliver results.  It's time to stand up and be counted.  Clients need to be shown that raido will enthusiastically shoulder its share of marketing challenges.

More questions than answers on why CBC really needs another Toronto FM Licence.

The recent action taken by the Department of Canadian Heritage (intervening on behalf of the CBC) threatened to abort the Toronto and Montreal FM licence application processes.  This represents one of the more significant precedents in the history of Canadian Broadcasting.  Among other things, it could have rendered the primary licensing authority, the CRTC, virtually impotent.  Now is the time to examine the facts surrounding this important issue.

Let's look at what has happened to date.  The CRTC asked that broadcasters register notice of application to obtain the remaining FM frequencies in Toronto and Montreal.  There are approximately 17 applicants for the frequency in Toronto and eight for the frequency in Montreal.  so far, so good.  Each applicant proceeded to spend up to $500,000 on the market analyses, technical briefs, etc. required for their bids.  That is par for the course.

What happened next was that the rules changed.  Legally speaking, it may be within the rights of the Canadian Heritage Minister to exercise her power by directing that the FM frequencies be reserved for the CBC.  This would pre-empt private broadcasters from participating in the process.  The Ministry suggested just that, forcing the CRTC to stay the two public hearings pending a cabinet direction.  Why did Sheila Copps and her protégés wait until late in the process to raise this issue?  If this was to be the reaction to recommendations contained in the Juneau Report, why was it not tabled in a timely manner?  Why was the CRTC not informed?  One might suggest that it bid for the frequency in an open competition.

Let's examine the CBC's reasons for desiring the new FM dial positions.  Essentially, the CBC wishes to transfer its AM programming to FM.  The states reason is the desire for a better signal with improved coverage.  The CBC is troubled by the fact that AM signal is blocked by office towers.  In fact, Toronto's 740AM ahs one of the best AM signal patterns available.  The CBC AM hours tuned are well over double those of the FM.  In Montreal, the AM also out performs the FM by almost 2 to 1.

It seems clear that a negative message about the AM band is being sent out by the government.  Such a position is wholly inappropriate.  AM talk stations continue to thrive across North America.  CFRB in Toronto (one of Canada's most listened to radio stations) delivers an outstanding audience with a signal inferior to that of 740AM.  CJAD in Montreal continues to deliver sizeable audiences.  The fact is that talk does not benefit from the frequencies above 10kHz that FM would deliver (since the human voice doesn't use those high frequencies).  In that CBC AM is predominantly talk, assigning an FM band would appear to be a waste.

Given that the industry is in the process of upgrading all analog signals (AM and FM ) to digital, it is a mystery as to why CBC would bear huge capital expenditures replacing AM transmitters with FM facilities which then must shortly be replaced by digital facilities.

Not surprisingly, broadcasters reacted with outrage.  Michael McCabe (president and CEO of the Canadian Association of Broadcasters) officially states his grave concern's over the government's position.  Angry applicants considered law suits if their lobbying against Heritage Canada's position died not succeed.

Private broadcasters who generate jobs and bolster the economy are becoming impatient with the favoritism shown the CBC.  In Toronto alone, the CBC currently boasts seven media outlets (English and French).  Is this not sufficient?  Certainly no private broadcaster would be permitted that kind of ownership.

After a substantial amount of lobbying and extensive press coverage, the federal Cabinet put the whole process back in the arena of the CRTC.  It would seem that the heat that has been generated left politicians unwilling to back the position taken by Heritage Canada.  The date for final submissions was pushed back to facilitate, among other things, the preparation of CBC's application.

The Canadian Association of Broadcasters and licence applicants have expressed relieve.  Still, this unsettling affair has left broadcasting in Canada with a dubious precedent, the specter of future intervention, and one might say, a disturbing heritage.

Without question, the cornerstones of most successful broadcast enterprises are the cooperative attitudes and approaches used when building and managing cohesive teams.  Though the premise may seem terribly simple, putting it into practice is anything but.

Listen.  You can hear a buzz in the air.  It's being caused by a new Toronto FM frequency (99.1) about to be allocated by the CRTC.  this is the last possible site on the dial and a small group of applicants are hotly pursuing it.  all of the major broadcast conglomerates currently have a Toronto license, effectively prohibiting them from joining the fray.  The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the contest and the issues being discussed.  I should mention that I have been working with one of the applicants, All Toronto.  Still the purpose of this piece is not to rank the submissions or to suggest which one is the most deserving.

The applicants break out into two basic categories.  About half focus on improving the overage area and/or signal strength of existing stations, while the remainder are putting forward new formats for which they see a programming hole in the market.  Cultural contributions and niche programming for minorities play a significant role in the arguments put forward by the latter group.

The application with the highest profile and greatest degree of controversy is undoubtedly the CBC.  Their goal is to move the popular AM740 to the FM Band.  They site problems with the signal strength of their current configuration as a rationale for the move.  The currently have two other FM signals in Toronto (one English and one French).  Earlier in the process, the Canadian Heritage Minister considered exercising her power to direct that the FM frequencies be reserved for the CBC.  This would preempt private broadcasters from participating in the process.

The CRTC were, in fact, forced to stay two public hearings pending a Cabinet direction.  Ultimately, due to an ensuing furor, the cabinet chose not to pursue this option, leaving the CBC to argue the merits of its application in an open competition.  Given FM's limited full coverage reach as compared to AM, the CBC has also requested additional FM licenses for outlying communities.

Also in the hunt for a better signal is the winner of the last licence granted, Rawlco.  They are seeking to upgrade CISS-FM which is hampered by the relatively low power (13,000 watts) of its current position (92.5).  In recent years there have been no groups more effective at licence applications.  They certainly have the CRTC's ear.

Looking to upgrade its position is Hot 103.5's Dufferin Communications.  This dance station (one of two in the market) is currently very active in Toronto although its licence is Orangeville-based.

the owners of another Toronto area station, CHWO, are seeking to establish a nostalgia format.

When it comes to submissions touting a unique cultural contribut8ion, none have garnered as much talk as that of Denham Jolley and Milestone Communications.  Their proposed "world urban" format, a sort of inner city dance, is being promoted as addressing the needs of the local black community.  This is quite a sensitive issue, especially since Milestone lost out last time to the other end of the musical spectrum, country.

All Toronto is headed up by Doug Bingley of Rock 95 in Barrie.  Also in the group are well known broadcasters Roy Hennessy and Sandy Davis.  they are looking to establish a rhythmic CHR, a new music hit station which the market has lacked since the shift of AM640.  This group has made the largest pledge (in dollars) toward Canadian talent development.  the interesting cultural angle here is the commitment to fund and foster a national aboriginal network on the sideband.

Another well known broadcaster, J. Robert Wood (ex of the CHUM group) is putting his money on dance.  In the other corner is Durham Radio with its bid for another country format.

Lastly there is Ron Dixon and Vancouver's Radio One (CKST) who are proposing an Adult contemporary / World Music format.  Ron recently made an unsuccessful bid for a Vancouver license.

It is being said that the license will got to the group demonstrating the greatest contribution to culture.  This is particularly true since this is the last band, and thus the last opportunity to provide distinct groups with a new voice.

That having been said, the decision becomes complicated.  Which group, if any, is the most deserving?  Aboriginals or blacks?  Perhaps a world music that covers a variety of bases?  Or Sheila Copps' first choice, the CBC, with its national mandate to bond Canadians together.

Stay tuned for further developments as applicants rev up their computers and flex their presentation skills for the CRTC.  Soon we'll have an answer.  Perhaps then this buzzing in my ears will stop.

In their quest to increase radio revenues, broadcasters have traditionally sold radio short in one particular area; creative.  Few would argue that the quality of creative has a significant impact on any radio campaign.  Production values and engineering ingenuity help to ensure that the advertisers (or station's) aural image breaks through.  Why then has ad creative traditionally been positioned as being a no charge throw in to retail advertisers.


The lifting of the FM hits restriction will have a huge impact on programmers, advertisers and listeners.

It seems that the squares have come full circle.  After years of almost impenetrable programming regulations that amounted to advanced algebra, the usually stodgy CRTC has turned FM radio back into a much less regulated forum.  Up until now, FM stations were constrained and limited to 49% hits.  Effectively, and somewhat perversely, this meant that listeners were prevented from hearing some of their favorite songs... or at least hearing them as much as they would like. 


In the beginning, there was CHUM.  For young people growing up in Toronto during the 50's, 60's and 70's, 1050 CHUM was something of a religion.  One that defined pop music and pop culture.  For many of us there is a certain reverence for the songs that are interwoven with memories of the era.  There was an energy, innocence and enthusiasm that has given way to more cynical times.  As Bob Seger once said, "I wish I didn't know now what I didn't know then."  On a tough day, it's easy to feel like that.

In 1957 Allan Waters launched hit radio in Canada with the debut of CHUM.  It is difficult to estimate the full impact of the station's influence in the years that followed.  For Canadian artists, making the hallowed FHUM Chart meant that their careers were taking off.  Listeners enthusiastically picked up their free copies of the chart at record stores.  Even after all these years, those same charts are prized collector's items; icons that map out the memories of our youth.  for fun, check out the charts on CHUM's searchable web site (www.1050chum.com.)

The station consistently drew a large, diverse and loyal audience.  The baby boom generation, comprising a significant percentage of the overall population, were reaching adolescence and tuning in to the station for the sound-track to their youth.  DJ's like Jungle Jay Nelson (who is currently being honoured in Cleveland's Rock and Roll Hall of Fame) were household names.  Clients lined up for promotional considerations and airtime.

By the late 1970's and the 1980's the FM band made a dramatic impact on AM.  Transistor radios gave way to boom boxes and car stereo systems.  Classic rock and new wave emerged as viable music formats.  Young listeners tended to be audiophiles who preferred FM stereo with its increased fidelity and frequency range.  CHUM finally came to a crossroads.  In 1986 it was time to grow up.

Ultimately, the rationale for moving to an oldies format was financial in nature.  The baby boom bulge in the population could still be counted on for the station's financial wellbeing.  Now that they had grown older, give them the music of their youth on the station that they remembered fondly.  This 35-54 demo with high discretionary income is attractive to advertisers.  This audience will tune to a mono signal in order to hear the songs they love.  The hit restrictions on the FM band prevented the oldies format from cropping up there.  In fact, the new CRTC ruling continues to protect oldies AM stations by limiting the hit songs released prior to 1981 that FM plays.

CHUM, along with CHUM-FM, remains the company's flagship station in Canada.  CHUM is one of the few financially viable music-based stations remaining on the AM band in Canada's major markets.  The strong trend on that band has been toward talk, following the U.S. lead.  CHUM Ltd. itself has been developing a syndicated talk network.  Still its flagship station continues to crank out the tunes, presenting a unique alternative to Toronto's over-crowded talk on AM.

From the outset, the Waters team (Allan and son Jim) displayed a distinctive approach to sales.  While other stations were volume driven, giving preferential rates to larger customers, CHUM remained very sympathetic to smaller clients, feeling that they too were valued and deserved the same rates as the big boys.  The Waters also felt that their product was worth a certain amount regardless of the client's target demo, and as such were reluctant to cut outrageous deals.  Lastly, the Waters' pride in each of their properties was exemplified by the fact that both the AM and FM were strongly promoted and sold in a standalone fashion as opposed to following the combo approach adopted by other broadcasters.

On the national sales side, CHUM has maintained, as Tim Stelle put it, "a great working partnership" for 30 years with Major Market Broadcasters.

MMB was formed in 1967, with Allan Waters purchasing a 15 per cent share, which he maintains to this day.  National rep shops have come and gone.  Consolidation has swept a good many of them aside, but MMB keeps rolling along, currently representing about 80 stations across Canada.

The current approach to sales is dramatically different from days gone by when we bought and sold spots.  Straight GRPs are about to go the way of the dinosaur.  Simple demo runs are not sufficient to give you a sales edge in an era when everyone has their own computer.  Reps must be knowledgeable about the format, attuned to promotional considerations, and well versed in the qualitative/lifestyle data that better defines a station's audience and its ability to strategically target a client's consumer.

What does the future hold for 1050 CHUM?  It is impossible to speculate.  Digital will, over the next decade, change the playing field.  CRTC deregulation will also impact on market complexions.  Why worry about tomorrow today while were' having so much fun remembering yesterday?

I have to admit, it is a little difficult to be objective about CHUM's early history.  Given that this venerable station is celebrating its 40th birthday, I prefer to reflect on fond memories.  Now, if I can only remember where I put my collection of old CHUM charts.


The polities of national versus local concerns have long proved to be divisive.  Little wonder that in the world of radio sales this rift continues to separate less successful from more profitable operations.

It is generally held that radio sales are approximately75-80 per cent local and 20-25 per cent national.  the difficulty arises when we try to define what constitutes a national account.  Moreover, who gets the right to service that account, a local sales executive or a national rep shop?  Throw in the topic of commission and this discussion gets ugly.  The losers are inevitably the client (who is caught in the middle), the station and the medium as a whole with its image further tarnished.  The position that defines any business with a storefront as a local account has long ago lost any credence.  Infighting is rampant.  At a time when the medium sorely needs and deserves proactive selling, the battle isn't even making it out the front door.

There are a variety of voices vying for attention at the latest CRTC radio hearings.  The question is who's worth listening to?  Let's try to sift through the issues the key players and the possible implications of change.  The primary items for consideration are Cancon regulations and duopolies.  Let's start with the latter.

A review of broadcast ownership policies is being prompted in the U.S. experience with duopolies.  Currently in Canada, one corporation is limited to ownership of a maximum of one AM and one FM station (of the same language) in each market.  The exception is Windsor where the CHUM group was permitted to acquire all four stations (2 AM and 2 FM) in order to survive against Detroit competition.  Shaw has an ownership position in two Toronto area FM stations, CFNY-FM and FM108, giving them a strangle-hold on younger listeners.  Technically FM108 is in Burlington.  Secondly, the ownership is held by, among others, Shaw principals such as Terry Strain and Hal Blackadar as opposed to all being held by Shaw itself.

The only real option currently available to Canadian broadcasters in need of a more financially efficient management approach is a LMA (local management agreement).  Such arrangements have been made in, for example, Sudbury, Winnipeg, North Bay and Saskatoon.  there, some management and sales functions of different stations were combined with certain conditions.  Each licensee retains ownership of their station assets and maintains a separate programming, news, and senior management staff.



In this era of added value, we're constantly being asked "how much is it worth to you?"  The ‘It’ in question could be a promo / liner, a new morning host, or a divorce (seemingly quite a popular item with overworked radio execs).

This month I did a bit of shopping around in an attempt to analyze value systems in the world of radio.

Why has payola never been a factor in Canada as compared to the U.S.A.?  Why don't we have hordes of independent promo people waving wads of cash in return for a playlist add?  I would like to think it is because of our moral superiority.  The truth may be that it doesn’t' pay enough.  It isn't worth it for those who are criminally inclined.  As one major market programme director said to me, "Canada isn't big enough.  I was offered 50 bucks once".

Of course when you wade into the grey area of contra, the stories are legend.  Sadly, Revenue Canada doesn't appreciate poetic license when it comes to bookkeeping practices.

Speaking of building and renovations, there is another area that doesn't quite stand up to closer inspection - "paper hanging."  I've been told many times that "that doesn’t' take place here anymore".  How is it then that happy to help out salespeople at certain sold out stations will give desperate buyers perfectly timed phone calls.  "We've just had a cancellation."  You can hear the implication oozing toward you... how much is it worth to you?
 

As the recently released census figures indicate, the face of Canada's population is rapidly changing.  As we approach the millennium, much of the business community is ill prepared to address the new complexion of marketing opportunities.  Those that don't face up to the new reality will be quickly left behind.  The truth is, niche or multicultural marketing can translate into increased profits.

Many of us come from liberal arts backgrounds where political correctness has us constantly stutter stepping to keep from putting the proverbial foot in the mouth.  God forbid we mention anyone's religion, cultural heritage, sex or sexual preference, lest we be coloured prejudiced.  It was assumed (if all went well) that society would become one huge happy homogeneous melting pot.  Then something happened to muddy the picture's reality.

It has become impossible to ignore the fact that cultural background significantly affects our attitudes, not to mention our lifestyles and purchasing patterns.




Dear Diary: 

We've been keeping you for quite some time now but we've become a little concerned that some of the stories you've been telling us are less than accurate.

In the world of radio measurement in Canada, we've been forced to court the BBM diary since radio revenues are married to its figures.  You can dally with Angus Reid, Birth or other suitors, but you must eventually come back to BBM.

The problem is, of course, that the diary methodology brings with it baggage that can weigh down the results.  In this issue I want to take a look at the problems facing the diary and the promising alternatives which are looming on the horizon.

Every methodology has its own set of built in biases.  The diary consistently under reports Men 18-24, much to the chagrin of rock and CHR stations.  The poor response rates for that demo indicate an entrenched reluctance among young men to "put it in writing".

Additionally the fact that diaries are not rostered may favour better known stations.  Promotion campaigns are geared to cementing call letters and slogans in diary keeper's minds.  Is secondary or peripheral tuning being accurately accounted for?  After testing a rostered diary, BBM concluded that for the additional expense and effort involved, repose rates and accuracy were not significantly improved.

Diaries also have proved to be consistently deficient in capturing the habits of multilingual listeners.  These respondents are particularly uncomfortable with having to provide a written response in English.  As the multicultural nature of our society becomes more vibrant, this group of consumers becomes increasingly difficult to ignore.

Few would argue that passive metering systems if properly implemented, offer us the best hope for the future.  Relying on people's memories for the reporting of tuning habits is so problematic that -- I forget what I was going to say.  At any rate, the experience of watching diary respondents recount their activates --- when, where and how they filled in the books --- is more than a little entertaining.

The first passive system to get up and running is Mobiltrak.  It is currently available only in Toronto (where it has been tested prior to moving into U.S. markets).  This system electronically measures tuning in passing cars.  Electronic Measurement Units are placed along busy thoroughfares where tens of thousands of car radios can be monitored in a day.  when thinking about the value of in car tuning measurement to advertisers, consider the fact that 98 per cent of shoppers drive to stores and 90 per cent of shoppers listen to the radio on the way to making a purchase.

Mobiltrak offers timely (daily) measurement with huge sample sizes and unerring accuracy, given that the respondents don't have to do anything.

Geographical areas can be limited (e.g. Scarborough) so that destination retailers can look only at cars passing through their buying area.  Still, the downside is not insubstantial.  Demos can't be broken out.

There is no qualitative / product usage data.  Lastly the system only covers FM tuning, ignoring AM patrons.  This measurement methodology must be viewed as a complimentary system.

With all this discussion on the relative merits of different methodologies, it is interesting to note that the results reported for Howard Stern's launch on Q107 in Toronto very closely reflected the A12+ numbers which were eventually reported in BBM.  Is it possible that the diary isn't so bad after all?

Different passive systems are currently being developed in Switzerland, Germany and the U.S.A.  Both Radiocontrol and Infratest Burke are on the verge if implementing promising systems which involve participants wearing watches (isn't that a sing of the times?) which pick up audible radio broadcasts in the listener's vicinity.  The data is decoded through the comparison of captured waveforms with those of the broadcasting stations.  When combined with a questionnaire to get further demo and qualitative data, these systems provide a vastly improved measurement system.  I'll let the cynics decide whether or not their projected implementation over the next couple of years is overly optimistic.

The Personal Portable Meter (what happened to the 4 P's?) is still being developed by Arbitron in the U.S.  This system is somewhat more complex in that it involves broadcasters encoding their signals.  The pocket-sized meters are carried by listeners and docked nightly for decoding.  BBM entered into an agreement with Arbitron a few years back to share in the development of this product.  After being highly touted, implementation hasn't proceeded as quickly as expected.

When we get do get true passive measurement what can we expect?  We'll probably see higher levels for occasional stations and unplanned listening stations, off peak hours and out of home tuning which have in the past relied most heavily on respondents' memories.  Taking recall out of the equation will undoubtedly add up to a more accurate reflection of overall tuning patterns.

Dear Diary:  I guess we'll be keeping you for a while yet.  But when it comes to change, the writing is on the wall.

Even in this digital age, the tables keep turning.  For the record (or at least the Cancon CD), the CRTC has once again changed the playing surface.  After careful consideration and a substantial amount of lobbying, our friends in Ottawa have passed two new rulings which will dramatically affect the broadcast community.  The complex question that must once again be asked after examining the new bill is who is going to pay?  Let me get out my looking glass.




Good ones soar but turkeys don't fly.  That was the hard lesson learned by Les Nessman of WKRP in Cincinnati concerning radio promotions.  The medium of choice when it comes to great promotions has historically been radio.  I thought I'd take a brief look at some past campaigns as well as ways in which to better target an initiative.

I have always marveled at some on-air announcers facility with numbers.

Imagine my astonishment as I sat in the booth witnessing the jock answer calls with..  You’re the 239th caller... you're the 537th caller... congratulations you're the 1007th caller!  Who needs a computer for computations?  This is RADIO.

Of course numbers have long played a major role in promotions, especially those digits that correspond to the dial position in question.  Whether it's a dollar amount or the 999 greatest songs of all time, it's important to reinforce that dial position in the listener's mind in case a diary finds its way into their hands.  Preferably, listeners should be so conditioned that jotting down the number in question is an involuntary response.  It doesn't hurt if they always answer the phone with a passionate "I love Hot75.3" Grandma won't mind.

In the age of added value, there is an ever increasing demand for sales promotions.  This makes sense, since it is an area in which the medium excels.

If they're properly handled, station and sales promotions can meld.  Just imagine a world without conflict; the programme director giving knowing winks and a slap on the back to the sales manager (N.B.: beware of sexual harassment).

There is no reason why a well targeted promotion can't satisfy both the listener and the advertiser while maintaining the basic integrity of the programme.

A first step in designing a promotion should be an analysis of the station's listenership profile.  Too often we rush out in search of the big idea without thinking it through.  The BBM qualitative data is a great place to start.  Should we really have a ski team for a station with the majority of listeners over 55?

Closely examine the recreational habits, purchasing patterns and attitudinal traits of your core listenership.  Give them what they want and need, not what you think is a neat idea.

There have been a number of memorable promotions over the years.  The most successful are those that generate talk in the market.  One example is the Mystery Money Man put on by CKLW-FM in Windsor.  A man dressed in a white tuxedo pulled up in his limousine to various locations including grocery stores, bars, and a soup kitchen.  Without ever identifying himself, he would shout "We all need more" and hand out $100 bills.  This mystery man generated extensive coverage from all media, including competitive radio stations.  When the man finally sent out a note offering to reveal himself at a given place and time, he was greeted by a crowd of thousands who were told he was promoting MORE94.  The total bill for the promotion was a mere $18,000.

There have been a few spectacular house giveaways.  The first I know of, at CHED, generated 250,000 entries in a market of 650,000.  Just last year, one at Z95.3 in Vancouver threw B.C. Tel into a frenzy.

Others like the $58,000 Goal at CKY can generate great news stories.  Three times in 4 years, CKY paid out $58,000 for a goal scored into a small slot from the opposing blue line.  While Lloyds of London was not amused, shows like David Letterman were, and they aired the clip.  Here's a tip: photograph and videotape events and send them to the media for slow news days.  Don't wait for them to come and cover it.

Other talk generators were Mike Cooper's record sit on a Ferris wheel for CHUM and Neil Hedley's month long sit on a billboard as part of 105.3 Kool-FM's Poster Boy campaign to benefit the United Way.  There have been a number of great Christmas promotions (e.g. CISS-FM's Toy Mountain) which serve a good cause and deliver positive image association.

66CFR (a gold base station) had a tremendous success when it rented out the Saddledome, brought in the Beach Boys, and gave away all the tickets.  They won the hearts of existing and potential listeners.  This promotion was talked about in Calgary for years after the concert.

An important consideration when developing an idea is whether you are targeting your existing core listenership in order to improve hours tuned or looking to expand your base with a cume generator.  A number of promotions targeting in-office tuning have very successfully generated huge hours tuned numbers.  Set the dial and leave it.  Take a look at CHFI-FM's success with this approach.

Controversy (i.e. Howard Stern) is a great way to generate press, talk and cume.  The goal is holding the audience after Howard signs off.  Also, how do you continue to generate a furor book after book?

One of the top promotions of all time wasn't flashy, but was consistently effective.  Rawlco's Mugs & Kisses has been potent in market after market across the country.  In one morning, CISS-FM gave out 25,000 mugs to people getting off the Go Train.  The mugs continue to serve as ongoing billboards in thousands of offices across the country.

When it comes to prize giveaways, it's important to keep in mind that only about 6% of listeners participate.  Your contest should be entertaining listening for the other 94%.

Turkeys don't fly.  If you do the research and make sure you're feeding your listeners something geared to their tastes, your promotion will take wing.


Radio people are always looking for new ways to generate revenue.  Few, could argue that, in order to do so, radio has had to reinvent itself over the years.  It is that very flexibility which has allowed the medium to thrive during different ages.  Now is the time to address a new generation of opportunities.

The CRTC ruling allowing duopolies effectively clears the way for radio in major markets across Canada to be controlled by a few significant groups.  One of the most influential of these is Standard Radio Inc.  To understand its history, you have to take a closer look at who is holding the reins.

President Gary Slaight is one of the driving forces behind the policies that characterize Standard.  His father, Allan Slaight, purchased the group in 1985 and son, Gary, joined him in 1987.  In recent years, Gary has overseen the day to day dealing of the firm's radio division.

while some groups become bogged down by red tape, requiring a committee to confirm the time of day, that isn't true at Standard.  the always -decisive Slaights hold the reins.  This approach affords a variety of benefits.  When it comes to acquisitions, they can proceed aggressively without having to answer to shareholders.  Gary has been working to build a strong network of rock stations in major markets across Canada.  One of the more recent purchases was that of Z95.3/CISL in Vancouver for a rumored purchase price of approximately $18 million.  That turned out to be a steal as Z95.3 with its 12+ tuning share of 13.1 per cent is a market leader.  Add to that rockers CJAY92 in Calgary, the Bear in Edmonton, the Bear in Ottawa, MIX 96 in Montreal and flagship MIX 99.9 in Toronto and you have a network to be reckoned with.  With the exception of their recent sale of St. Catharine's HTZ-FM to the O'Briens for "too much to turn down," Standard seems to be assuming an acquisitive posture.  Gary Slaight confirmed that HTZ-FM wasn't fitting into their long-term major market strategy and would be better off in the hands of a local broadcaster.

This chart covering Standar's major market stations as of the Summer '98 BBM demonstrates the firm's overall strength.

Whereas other conglomerates such as WIC have tended to allow each market operation to operate more or less independently, Standard has continued to centralize many functions.  By cutting through much of the red tape, Slaight has managed to strictly control operating costs and deliver impressive profit margins.

Slaight brought in well-known programmer Jim Johnston (J.J.) as director of programming for the group.  In his career J.J. has posted some great numbers for a variety of rock stations, most recently the FOX, and then CFMI-FM in Vancouver.  His influence is immediately apparent, particularly in the strides made by Toronto's MIX 99.9.  One of his many innovations was the insertion of multilingual breakers/liners.  This kind of progressive thinking is critical in a market that has been called the "most culturally diverse in the world".  Johnson works on a weekly basis with the great lineup of programmers in the other markets to share successes, promotion ideas, and ensure continuity throughout the group.  One persistent rumour had Standard brining hot talker Howard Stern into Ottawa as well as other markets.  Slaight now offers assurances that this won't happen, given the costs, the controversy, and the declining ratings for Stern.

On the sales front, Bill Hertz assumes the role of national director of sales, coordinating the efforts of GSM's across the country.  Except for one brief dalliance with the CHUM group, Hertz has been a long time employee of Standard.  Hertz proudly points to the fact that Standard aggressively seeks to drive the overall cost per points in their markets.  At the same time, he stressed the importance of "client service" and "new ideas" for clients.  Along those lines, Standard's centralized approach has allowed them to develop national promotions and features for clients with all their FM stations participating.

In this era of acquisitions, amalgamations, and duopolies, there is one certainty concerning Standard Radio.  With the Slaights holding the reins, it's going to be an exciting ride.


Over the past year I've been to a few spectacular send-offs, lavish lunches and rapturous retirement dinners.  But sadly, for the vast majority of good people making excellent contributions in the broadcasting / advertising/marketing industries, no such honours wait in store.  Please consider this my simple tribute to those who are too often forgotten.

In part, as a consequence of consolidations and conglomerate buyouts, we have recently seen a wave of layoffs.  A new owner often spells trouble for the old staff.  Or perhaps it is someone new at the helm implementing a series of cost cutting measures.  Or a bad ratings book.  Or it may just be an employer who has forgotten the meaning of loyalty.

Being a middle ages, mid-level manager without a job has become frighteningly common.  Nobody is lobbying on behalf of those individuals.  This is not to make light of the prejudice that others in our communities have faced.  Those are serious situations that society is working to address.  But who speaks for the little guy who has been cut loose; the working family man and woman who have tried to do their best for so many years simply to find themselves friendless when whatever power they had is gone.  All of a sudden, people aren't so quick to return their calls.

This piece was prompted by a couple of recent emails I received, which were farewell notes from friends recently shown the door.  That is a true mid life crisis.

They need to make a living to support their families but find a decided lack of openings for someone with their experience.  Starting over in a different field is a daunting challenge.  Employers aren't exactly champing at the bit for trainees in their forties or fifties.

Even more insidious is the threat to their sense of self-worth.  Somewhere along the line our priorities have gotten dangerously of of whack.  Politically astute glad handers get gala dinners while truly decent, conscientious hard working individuals get forgotten.

No Hall of Fame in their future.  Well those people are my heroes.

Why do we respect the smug and sometimes cruel people who misuse power?  I think of a well-known senior executive who gleefully told the story of how he reduced one of his managers to tears.

In the end, I will remember those who gave it their all, acting with humanity and always keeping their priorities straight.  After all, a great cost per point, a number one in the ratings, or one's ability to exceed sales quotas aren't really worth much as an epitaph.  I know that, to some, this sentiment may seem quaint or even humorous.  We'll probably never share the same values.

The ones I respect are all those that face adversity with dignity.  That fight on for their families while maintaining the respect of their friends.  I may not be able to afford a gala, but you'll always be welcome at my place for dinner.


I find myself at a loss for words. I make no claim to being the purveyor of profound insights. In fact, I am constantly astonished by how little I really know. The awareness of that fact comes with time and experience. The certainty of youth soon gives way to a sometimes confused pondering of various perspectives. Perhaps I can best summarize with the title of a piece I wrote, "The More I Learn, The Less I Know." But sometimes you are struck by words and actions that resonate with such emotion that for at least a moment, a truth becomes clear.

A few months ago I wrote a column that was "a Tribute to the little guy." A simple tribute to good people making excellent contributions in the broadcasting/advertising/marketing industries for whom no Hall of Fame, lavish lunches or spectacular sendoffs wait in store.

I wrote of my respect for those facing mid-life crises in the form of layoffs.

I'll say it again. These people are my heroes. I concluded with the following:

"In the end, I will remember those who gave it their all, acting with humanity, and always keeping their priorities straight. After all, a great cost per point, a number one in the ratings, or one's ability to exceed sales quotas aren't really worth much as an epitaph. I know that, to some, this sentiment may seem quaint or even humorous. We'll probably never share the same values.

The ones I respect are all those that face adversity with dignity. That fight on for their families while maintaining the respect of their friends. I may not be able to afford a gala, but you'll always be welcome at my place for dinner."

I thank both the RTNDA and Dick Smyth for reprinting the piece.

I have to say that when I wrote those words, it never occurred to me that I was doing anything more than spitting into the wind. With age, we can also become jaded and a bit cynical. Then a series of responses began to come in. Your notes resonated with me in a way that my simple words can't begin to express. Most of all, it left me with the sense that there are some very special people out there with their hearts and values in the right place. The responses came from people in senior and junior positions. From those who have faced difficult circumstances and those who have good luck (so far).

Many just wrote to express their agreement with the sentiment:

"There are a great many of us who share your sentiment and don't find it quaint or humorous. On behalf of all the little guys...."

"I could not agree with you more. We must remember if it wasn't for the people in the trenches most companies would not be where they are today."

"I didn't want to vent as I am one of those left behind. I just wanted to thank you for recognizing the forgotten ones. It's people like you that in the long run make the difference."

One person maintained their sense of humour:

"Been there, done that, got the t-shirt (and the scars). As it has been some years since I found myself in that situation, it's still a tender memory, tender as in "that still hurts" as opposed to a fond thought. Granted, we all rise above adversity and in many cases, good things come from a major paradigm shift - but it still doesn't change the emotional impact, which you so eloquently captured in your article."

One person offered a succinct response to the rash of layoffs:

"I'm keeping my head down, flying below the radar, and not making any waves, hoping to make it to retirement without getting gassed. Hell of a way to end a career."

Another looks back:

"My memory of 30 years in radio is full of names of talented people who haven't survived and have moved on to other things. Too bad. Perhaps your reminder of the humanity of our business will remind some manager/owner somewhere to recall that this is a 'people' business."

Many of the responses were very personal:

"I am personally acquainted with half a dozen or more of those people, and married to one. I too am in the broadcast industry, but so far have escaped the dragon's teeth....Kudos to you for pointing out the injustice, and for patting the little guys on the back. It's not what they really want, but a little recognition of their plight is like salve on an open wound. I hope someone in a leather chair is listening, and sees a reflection of themselves in your message. Thank you."

Some reflected on those talented middle aged people facing difficult circumstances:

"...the unsung heroes of our business who are put out to pasture in their 40's and 50's... If people in the business think Grey Power was a powerful force just wait till the boomers start flexing their collective might..."

One of the most moving notes came from a daughter:

"my father sent me a copy of your piece on job loss. He just lost his job after working for the company for 24 years. He now finds himself being one of the middle management with no where to go. He sent me a copy of what you wrote because it really touched him. Recently I attended a big send off for someone in my company, and I spent a large part of the evening thinking how much my father deserved one. Instead he was laid off over the phone.

It makes me feel wonderful to know that there are still decent people in the business world. After how my father has been treated, I've been left with very little hope. Thank you for what you've written, I know you've made my father feel much better about what has happened to him and hopefully your words will encourage others to treat laid off people with more respect."

While I don't know the gentleman referred to, he must be very special indeed to have raised such a daughter. In my heart, people like her father will always be the true heroes. I suppose we are all best judged by those whose lives we have truly touched.

Your words, stories and sentiments are more articulate than I could ever hope to be. I want to express my profound thanks for showing me that, despite days when it seems like the opposite, there are some very fine people out there sharing values that make us all a little bit stronger. I may not know much, but that is one truth I won't forget.



(Printed in "Broadcaster Magazine")


Last Friday, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission announced the results of its commercial radio policy review. The process began with four intense days of hearings held this past May in Gatineau, Quebec. Since then, members of the broadcast, music and advertising industries have been anxiously waiting for the word to come down. The surprising payoff? The regulations were not altered.

One portion of the decision that did not attract much attention, but perhaps should have, was L-band licensees - which "will be free to develop whatever broadcast services they believe will be of the greatest interest to the listening public." Remember that DAB stagnated largely because stations were limited to replication of existing AM/FM programming, with the exception of 14 hours per week. Consumers weren't willing to buy new receivers unless they could get alternative programming. Bottom Line: Look for innovative, niche and multicultural broadcasters to exploit this in a big way.

Let's take a look at the highlights, and most importantly, the ramifications of the decision. The CRTC made mention of the stiff competition the medium faces from new regulated and unregulated technologies for the distribution of music (MP3 players, iPods, Internet radio, podcasting, downloading, satellite radio and cellphone radio). "The key challenge facing the radio industry is to remain relevant" in the face of such new technologies, said CRTC chairman Charles Dalfen.

Still, little in the review beyond new approaches to Canadian content development directly addresses these issues. While it was widely expected that a bonus or quota system for new and emerging artists would be introduced, the minimum level of Cancon remains at 35% without further restrictions. Upping it to 40% was considered, but rejected due to the competitive climate in which radio finds itself.

Regulations were changed for classical (raised to 25% from 10%) and jazz and blues (up to 20% from 10%), but this will have an effect on relatively few stations. Bottom line: The CRTC essentially deferred to broadcasters by not imposing more taxing regulations while they are gearing up for the fight with outside influences.

Some important changes were made in the approach to Canadian content development (CCD) contributions. The basic contribution system would be based on a radio station's revenues, as opposed to the size of the market in which it operates. The CAB issued a release saying that "the increased burden that will result from tying these initiatives to broadcasters' revenues is of some concern." Bottom line: This is the way it always should have been - pay on the ability to do so. Smaller niche stations will be the grateful winners in this scenario.

Bottom line: I have a sense that the real review of radio will be conducted by the listeners who are being confronted with all of these choices. Stay tuned.
Digital Radio Roll-Out Inc. (DRRI), today announced that applications have been filed with the CRTC and Industry Canada, laying the groundwork for the launch of Digital Audio Broadcasting (DAB) in the nation’s capital early in 2002. Notification has been filed by all of the major broadcasters currently active in the market including Astral Radio Inc., CBC/Radio Canada, CHUM Ltd., Rogers Media, Standard Radio Inc., Telemedia Radio Inc.

Duff Roman, President of DRRI, made the announcement at the Canadian Association of Broadcasters (CAB) 75th Annual Convention, currently being held in Ottawa. Mr. Roman declared that "I’m pleased to see the ever-increasing support for DAB in Canada. This enthusiasm has helped to position our nation as a world leader in the development of digital radio. It is only fitting that listeners in the country’s seat of power be treated to the power of DAB - superb digital audio with the addition of value-added datacasting services."

Currently, over 55 DAB stations have made service available to 10 million people in Vancouver, Toronto, Windsor, and Montreal. A comprehensive engineering study is also underway which will plan for new digital audio broadcasting (DAB) stations to serve the major population corridors in Canada. Covered by the new services will be all markets between
Toronto - Windsor, Toronto - Ottawa, Toronto - Montreal, Montreal - Quebec City, Calgary - Edmonton, and Vancouver - Greater Fraser Valley. The planned expansion will add a series of markets including Hamilton, Kitchener, London, Cambridge, Guelph, Cornwall, Calgary, Red Deer, Edmonton, Quebec City, Trois Rivieres and Chilliwack.

Digital Radio Roll-Out Inc. (DRRI), is a non-profit joint initiative of major private broadcasters (Astral Radio Inc., CHUM Ltd., Corus Entertainment Inc., Rogers Media, Standard Radio Inc., Telemedia Radio Inc.), a number of smaller private broadcasters, and public broadcasters (CBC, Radio Canada) with the support of the Canadian government.
DRRI’s mandate is the introduction of digital audio broadcasting services across Canada. DAB is the replacement technology for current AM and FM analogue transmission.

Radio in Canada is about to make waves unlike any we have heard before. In fact, I would go so far as to call them tidal waves of change. As the CRTC convenes their overall review of radio in an attempt to map out the road for the future, digital radio in various incarnations is the central topic. A series of new applications (pun intended) for the medium are being explored. At the same time that the industry is working to determine the role that DAB will play in the years to come, the concept of subscription radio has been added to the mix. On top of all of this, the way radio tuning will be surveyed in the future is under examination by BBM. For radio fans, this is a sonic feast.

While DAB (Digital Audio Broadcasting) was initially contemplated as a replacement technology for AM/FM, its future clearly appears to rely on a revision of CRTC regulations to allow for introduction of DAB exclusive stations. In addition, a great deal of work is also currently being done on the development of third party datacasting applications which will generate revenue for the broadcasters investing in DAB.

Over 60 DAB versions of AM/FM stations are currently on air in Vancouver, Toronto, Windsor, Montreal, and Ottawa. Seven

Halifax DAB signals are also currently being field-tested. Applications have been made by the stations in Victoria. Experience has taught us that being a high tech replacement technology is good, but not enough. Soaring DAB receiver sales in the U.K. (over 400,000 since June of last year) has demonstrated the importance of DAB exclusive stations in addition to the greatly improved fidelity and data display features. The first multilingual DAB only license has been granted and a number of other applications are pending. Radio Canada/CBC has introduced its first experimental DAB station with their news/weather/traffic offering in Montreal. Look for some very progressive thinking and a number of exciting announcements from them in the near future.

And speaking of the future……if the CRTC buys into the concept of subscription radio, some very interesting alternatives for digital radio may be in store. The CRTC hearing on subscription radio is expected to be held by August or September. Heads were turned recently when three applications were submitted by the filing date. These include the XM/Canadian Satellite Radio and Sirius/CBC/Standard satellite proposals along with the CHUM Ltd. terrestrial/DAB solution. It had been widely expected to be a two way race focusing on the discussion of satellite. But, CHUM took the opportunity to look at an alternative approach utilizing the terrestrial DAB infrastructure, some of which is already in place. 

The initial consideration of subscription radio was triggered by the application made by Canadian Satellite Radio (CSR), a partnership with John Bitove Jr. and XM Satellite Radio based in Washington, D.C. CSR is promising 100 channels of nationwide music and information which will serve both urban and rural areas. The XM service in the U.S. has experienced substantial growth and currently boasts 1.5 million+ subscribers. An agreement to include XM receivers in GM vehicles has been a very positive force, one that is expected to be repeated in Canada. In order to compliment the existing channels, CSR is committed to building studios in both Toronto and Montreal. Moreover, Stewart Lyons of CSR proudly points to the Canadian content XM will be delivering not only to Canadians, but to listeners south of the border. Vice President of Programming, Bob Mackowycz emphasizes the fact that XM will give independent artists a voice in a way that mainstream radio can’t. CSR doesn’t see itself as being in competition with conventional radio, but rather as a compliment to it. One that offers cutting edge niche programming that mass appeal stations can’t afford to deliver. 

The CHUM subscription radio application involves a progressive rollout of urban centres that, by the end of the first term of license, will deliver 100+ commercial free DAB stations in a variety of formats with the much-touted DAB benefits… reliable reception, crystal clear sound, and a data display for song credits, weather, traffic, etc. Most importantly, the CHUM application stresses the fact they will fulfill or exceed the 35% CANCON requirements normally demanded by the CRTC. CHUM is rumoured to be speaking with other broadcasters and potential partners that could provide experience and expertise in subscription media services and wireless communications. It is presumed that the CHUM initiative would feature subsidized digital receivers which would offer both traditional free access for conventional DAB stations as well as their slate of conditional access stations for a $10 monthly subscription fee. 

While we don’t yet have all of the details on the Sirius satellite application (with CBC and Standard as partners), expect a formidable presentation. The value of the CBC to Canadians is highly regarded by Heritage Canada and the CRTC. The CBC sided with Sirius, in part, due to their preference for its satellite configuration from a technical perspective. It is also worth noting that the Sirius application makes mention of seeking the development of combined satellite/DAB receivers. If this becomes technically possible, it would provide an ideal solution for the CBC which is heavily committed to DAB in urban areas. The satellite transmission would allow them to adequately cover all outlying areas. 

Lastly, a BBM committee has been convened to review survey timing and methodology in Canada. The implications of changes in this area are quite far reaching for the industry. I hope to report on some exciting developments on this in the near future.

Listeners have been demanding change and they are, in all likelihood, about to get it. More varied programming options, improved fidelity, display features, and interactivity are just some the features that are in store. From a receiver standpoint, I have seen and heard some of the bells and whistles on the new models being developed for Canada and they are addictive. For example, a new pause and rewind feature (with a 10 minute buffer) allows you to scroll back and hear the traffic report you missed or listen to that last song over again. Things just keep getting better.

Standing still is simply not an option for a medium that prides itself as being the best option for those on the move. It would appear that a combination of DAB exclusive stations and subscription radio will offer valuable niche programming options which enhance the listeners experience without diminishing the vital day to day contribution of local broadcasters. Add to that exciting new digital receivers and a wealth of listener survey data. I think I hear the future….stay tuned.

(Published in "Broadcaster Magazine")


General Motors of Canada Limited (GMCL) announced today that GM will become the first automaker to deliver factory installed DAB (Digital Audio Broadcasting) technology to the automobile marketplace. This stunning development is the culmination of a strategic alliance formed between GM of Canada and Digital Radio Roll-Out Inc. ( DRRI). The two have been working together since 1998 to develop a made-in-Canada digital radio solution. The Oshawa-built Chevrolet Impala and Monte Carlo will be among the first models available with DAB.

Maureen Kempston Darkes, President and General Manager of GM of Canada made the announcement at the Canadian Association of Broadcasters (CAB) 75th Annual Convention saying “digital radio is the future of broadcasting in Canada. It provides consumers with new features such as CD quality sound and value-added data services. GM plans to be the
automaker of choice when it comes to digital technology and mobile commerce.” An enthusiastic Duff Roman, President of DRRI, declared that "this announcement establishes Canada as a world leader in digital radio. I am thrilled that, very soon, hundreds of thousands of GM car buyers will be treated to the true power of DAB - superb digital audio with the addition of value-added datacasting services delivered seamlessly to major markets across Canada. GM is to be applauded for its vision.”

Michael McCabe, President and CEO, Canadian Association of Broadcasters said "GM's announcement today reflects the inroads being made to really drive home the importance of DAB to the broadcasting system in Canada. Now, more and more Canadians have access to this technology where they go about their daily lives - in their homes, in their offices and now in
their cars."

Currently, over 55 DAB stations have made service available to 10 million people in Vancouver, Toronto, Windsor, and Montreal. Ottawa is next in line to be added to the market list, with preparation underway for an airdate of early 2002. Planned expansion into all major corridors will add a series of markets including Hamilton, Kitchener, London, Guelph, Cornwall, Calgary, Red Deer, Edmonton, Quebec City, Trois Rivieres and Chilliwack. Digital Radio Roll-Out Inc. ( DRRI), is a non-profit joint initiative of major private broadcasters (Astral Media Inc., CHUM Ltd., Corus Entertainment Inc., Rogers Media, Standard Radio Inc., Telemedia Radio Inc.), a number of smaller private broadcasters, and public broadcasters (CBC, Radio Canada) with the support of the Canadian government. DRRI’s mandate is the introduction of digital audio broadcasting services across Canada. DAB is the replacement technology for current AM and FM analogue transmission.


Digital Radio Roll-Out Inc. ( DRRI), today announced that 15 Ottawa area digital license applications have been approved the CRTC. This completes the groundwork for the launch of Digital Audio Broadcasting (DAB) in the nation’s capital, expected in early in 2003. All of the major broadcasters currently active in the market received approvals. The list of successful applicants includes Astral Radio Inc., CBC/Radio Canada, CHUM Ltd., Rogers Media, Standard Radio Inc.

Duff Roman, President of DRRI declared that "I’m pleased to see the ever-increasing support for DAB in Canada. This enthusiasm has helped to position our nation as a world leader in the development of digital radio. It is only fitting that listeners in the nation’s capital be treated to the power of DAB - superb digital audio with the addition of value-added datacasting services."

The 15 new licensees join the 57 DAB stations which have made service available to 10 million people in Vancouver, Toronto, Windsor, and Montreal. Halifax is expected to join the list by early 2003. A comprehensive engineering study was recently completed which will plan for new digital audio broadcasting (DAB) stations to serve the major population corridors in Canada. Covered by the new services will be all markets between Toronto - Windsor, Toronto - Ottawa, Toronto - Montreal, Montreal - Quebec City, Calgary - Edmonton, and Vancouver - Greater Fraser Valley. The planned expansion will add a series of markets including Hamilton, Kitchener, London, Cambridge, Guelph, Cornwall, Calgary, Red Deer, Edmonton, Quebec City, Trois Rivieres and Chilliwack.

Digital Radio Roll-Out Inc. ( DRRI), is a non-profit joint initiative of major private broadcasters (Astral Radio Inc., CHUM Ltd., Corus Entertainment Inc., Rogers Media, Standard Radio Inc.), a number of smaller private broadcasters, and public broadcasters (CBC, Radio Canada) with the support of the Canadian government. DRRI’s mandate is the introduction of digital audio broadcasting services across Canada. DAB is the replacement technology for current AM and FM analogue transmission.
Listen carefully and you can hear the countdown. The race is on and nothing less than the future of the radio industry in Canada is at stake.

The first critical step took place with the early November CRTC hearings in Ottawa/Hull at which 3 satellite/subscription applications were presented. In the room was a who’s who of Radio in Canada. The lobbying for intervention support leading up to all of this was intense. So much hand shaking and arm twisting took place that few people in the radio or music industries are left with shoulder sockets in tact. It would appear that traditional broadcasters have seen the writing on the wall since CHUM, Astral, Standard, CBC/Radio Canada, Rawlco and Corus are all throwing their hats into the ring in one way or another. Traditional radio remains very strong but continues to face the challenges of declining teen tuning and the restlessness of a public hungry for more while being accustomed to feasting on a variety of specialty television stations. For its part, the CRTC will be eager to avoid the grey market problems experiences with the implementation of satellite television.

Make no mistake, the Canadian radio industry overall remains healthy from both a financial perspective (with 2003 ad revenues of $1.2 billion, up 8.4% year over year) and in terms of audience tuning with a 94.8 percent national weekly reach and 21.8 hours tuned weekly per capita (A18+, BBM Spring 2004). Some signs are less than encouraging. Both BBM and the recently released Statistics Canada study confirm dramatic decreases in hours tuned per capita for teens.

Troubling for some listeners and from a music industry standpoint is the lack of new music and the lack of formatic variety. Especially in a world where CHR formats continue to give way to more gold based formats such as Jack, Dave, Bob, etc. Not that the radio industry should be making any apologies. Traditional stations are funded by ad revenue which demands that they strive to have broad-based appeal, garnering as many adults 25-54 as possible. This dictates familiar music without the risk of exposing new music or niche formats. Added to that are local news, weather and traffic. The truth is that broadcasters are currently doing a very good and professional job of it. Still, this underlines the need for complimentary services committed to exposing groundbreaking new music and a tapestry of vital niche formats that cry out to be heard. It seems clear that, as opposed to cannibalizing existing hours tuned, these complimentary services will repatriate listeners to radio and generate an excitement missing for generations. Folk, alt country, comedy, roots, electronica, blues, bluegrass, opera, jazz, singer-songwriter and a good deal more will now be given a second look and listen. Since these new stations would be driven by subscription revenue, the need to be all things to all people vanishes. Instead, the stations can strive to exist on their own terms, offering listeners something truly unique.

Heads were turned when three applications were submitted by the filing date. These include the XM/Canadian Satellite Radio and Sirius/CBC/Standard satellite proposals along with the CHUM Ltd. terrestrial/DAB offering. Radio observers here expected a two-way race focusing on the discussion of satellite, but CHUM took the opportunity to look at an alternative approach using Digital Audio Broadcasting in major markets. The three subscription radio applicants don’t see themselves itself as being in competition with conventional radio, but rather as a compliment to it. One that offers cutting edge niche programming that mass appeal stations can’t afford to deliver. Initial research seems to bear this out, although, it is too early to tell. It is worth noting that the subscription applicants include the major broadcast groups in the country who might be loathe to proceed if they felt they were going to cannibalize their own audience and revenue bases. There is a commitment from all concerned not to include local weather and traffic, a mainstay of conventional radio. From a marketing perspective there would be the opportunity for advertising on some talk stations while the music would be free of conventional ads. On the other hand, there would seem to be substantial opportunities for sponsorship on those stations which could prompt some very innovative marketing approaches.

The initial consideration of subscription radio was triggered by the application made by Canadian Satellite Radio, a partnership with John Bitove (a well known Canadian entrepreneur) and XM Satellite Radio. Bitove has put together a formidable team comprised of some of the country’s most respected artists, programmers, analysts and entertainment industry VIP’s. CSR is promising 100+ channels of nationwide music and information that would serve both urban and rural areas from coast to coast. The 5 unique channels (in the initial phase) to be produced in Canada include a variety of niche music programmes in both English and French hosted by noted Canadian

musicians/personalities as well as an All Comedy station which Mark Breslin (C.E.O. of Yuk Yuk’s International) calls “the best opportunity to expose Canadian comedy that I’ve seen in many years”. As in the U.S., there is an agreement to include XM receivers in GM vehicles made and sold in Canada (starting with the 2006 models should the license be awarded in time),

The Sirius satellite team (with CBC and Standard as partners) headed up by Kevin Shea features another strong team with substantial traditional radio experience. They would also promise 100+ channels of nationwide music and information with 5 unique Canadian offerings. The value of the CBC to Canadians is highly regarded by Heritage Canada (a government ministry protecting Canadian culture) and the CRTC. The CBC sided with Sirius, in part, due to its technical preference for the 3 constantly moving satellites which promise good coverage of certain rural areas. Experts seem to be divided on the benefits of the XM versus the Sirius satellite systems, both of which boast certain advantages.

The CHUM/Astral subscription radio application involves a progressive rollout of urban centres that will initially deliver 50 commercial-free satellite digital stations in a variety of formats with the much-touted digital benefits… reliable reception, crystal clear sound, and a data display . The CHUM/Astral initiative would feature subsidized digital receivers that would offer both traditional free access for conventional DAB stations as well as their subscription stations. The primary difference with this initiative is the fact that it wouldn’t be national as such, but rather would involve a series of terrestrially based stations in larger markets across the country sharing programming.

The CHUM application stresses the fact that all of the stations will meet or exceed the Canadian Content requirements mandated by the CRTC for traditional stations. The satellite applicants point to their ability to broadcast Canadian music into the U.S. on their CANCON only stations as well as playlisting an increased amount of Canadian music on the American based stations.

CANCON on conventional stations, while meeting the regulatory requirements, does relatively little to assist new or niche artists. Innumerable formats are left without voices. The primary result is having the likes of Celine Dione or Avril Lavigne move into ever higher rotation. The enthusiasm of independent Canadian artists for this subscription opportunity is infectious. Many major talents are looking at radio with renewed vigor and hope.

The monthly subscription fee for any one of the services will be in the $10-$13 per month range. The two satellite offerings have the auto industry on board for factory installed radios. XM (with its Elton John commercials in the U.S.) has also begun to tout its portable radios. The CHUM group, owners of MuchMusic and a variety of related properties, will initially focus on a young target group with portable radios. At the hearings, both the Canadian Satellite Radio team and the Sirius/Standard/CBC teams argued that the CRTC should license all three applicants and let the consumers decide which they prefer. CHUM/Astral argued that they would need to be the sole license winner in order for their model to be economically practical.

Satellite/subscription radio, with its wide diversity of formats, will make an important cultural contribution to radio listeners in Canada. Niche formats, normally lost in the melting pot of traditional radio will be given the voice that they deserve. Moreover, numerous Canadian artists, who wouldn’t normally receive much airplay on traditional stations, will be afforded the opportunity to have their music heard by a much wider audience, both across Canada and the sizeable U.S. market. This, in turn, affords our artists increased touring opportunities and CD sales. Listeners benefit by having access to cutting edge formats and exposure to artists that they might not otherwise hear. All this without giving up traditional local radio stations. It is the best of both worlds. It seems clear that this is the next step in the evolution of radio. One that is critical to the artistic and financial success of Canadian performers and writers.

The number of satellite subscribers in the U.S. is about 3 million and growing rapidly. This has the added benefit of revitalizing the radio receiver industry at retail. Expect the same to be true of the Canadian experience. In terms of a grey market, it is estimated that many thousands of Canadians are already listening to satellite radio.

Listeners and artists alike have been demanding change and they are, in all likelihood, about to get it. The radio industry is listening to them. I think I hear the future….stay tuned.


(Published in "Marketing Magazine")



They used to call it buying space. Not so long along ago, media buying was a relatively simple process. Success in media sales was dependent more on service than on savvy analysis. But much like most everything else in life, progress brought complexity. Every answer brings a new set of questions. So here advertisers sit in an era of increasing media fragmentation trying to ascertain what they should buy and in what combination. On the flip side of the coin, broadcasters and publishers are contemplating what properties they should buy in order to maintain control of the marketplace. Expansion brings us scores of new specialty TV channels catering to almost every whim, hobby, fantasy or fetish. In this turbulent atmosphere, radio has an opportunity that should not be overlooked.

Traditionally speaking, television has always been a mass medium while radio was somewhat more targeted with formats catering to specific niches. Suddenly, television is leapfrogging radio in its attempt to superserve narrowly defined niches. All History, All Golf, All Women’s Sports, All Weather, All Cartoons, etc. I’m waiting with anticipation for the new “All Female Left-handed Golfer’s Channel” beaming in 24 hours a day. Although they could run out of “A” list programming by 3am. But pity the poor buyer. Long gone are the days of programmes such as the finale of MASH which delivered astronomical audience shares and spectacular reach.

In the midst of these developments, the overall number of radio stations has remained fairly consistent. Credit the CRTC with this much…..it has not allowed Canadian markets to be flooded with unprofitable radio stations like we have seen in some U.S. cities.  While television audiences are being spread across a burgeoning menu of choices, the top radio stations continue to deliver the kind of audiences that advertisers have come to expect.

In Canada, radio has, by standing pat while the number of television stations explodes, improved its competitive position. Radio audience measurement is more detailed than ever with the availability of BBM’s single source demographic/product usage diary data and the incomparable RTS study. These afford the medium precise niche targeting without audience dilution.

While the number of radio stations may not have markedly increased, the revised ownership regulations issued by the CRTC have had a dramatic impact. Broadcast groups are now afforded the opportunity for multiple ownership in a market (e.g. a group can own two AM and two FM stations in a major market). This has resulted in expansion for certain major broadcast groups and the demise of others. With so much consolidation, the atmosphere is very difficult for independent broadcasters.

One development saw Astral Media purchase 19 radio stations in Quebec, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia from Telemedia. Adding CITE-FM to their CKMF-FM powerhouse gives Astral a formidable foothold in the Francophone Montreal market.

In the Anglophone Montreal market, Standard Radio picked up CHOM-FM which will make a nice addition to their current holdings, CJAD and MIX96.

In another stunning development, Standard Radio announced the acquisition of Telemedia stations in Ontario, Alberta and B.C. plus Craig stations in Manitoba and Alberta. Adding EZRock to MIX99.9 and CFRB in Toronto gives the group a very well rounded presence in Canada’s largest market. In subsequent transactions the northern Ontario properties were then sold to Rogers while other western properties were sold to Newcap.

With the exit of Telemedia from radio, the list of major ownership groups is becoming very thin. We have Corus, Astral, CHUM, Standard, Rogers and the CBC. The remaining groups, while providing essential and vibrant voices, are somewhat smaller. The question remains as to what will be the implications of these changes.

Certainly, one of the most interesting aspects of multiple station ownership in individual markets is better station positioning. Owners can zero in on a very specific niche which is complimentary to those targeted by their other stations. The listener/advertiser benefits in that there tends to be less format duplication. For example, fewer different owners slugging it out in the Female 25-54 Adult Contemporary arena. By dominating a distinct niche, owners afford themselves definite marketing advantages, not the least of which is setting the market cost per point for their given target. Advertisers can take advantage of group sales which boast domination of a targeted demo. For example, witness Corus Radio properties in Toronto. With Q107’s classic rock, Mojo Talk Radio for Guys (AM640) and The Edge’s (CFNY-FM) new music (not to mention Energy95.3) a group buy delivers excellent coverage of young males and certain lifestyle groups (e.g. beer drinkers).

Multiple ownership allows broadcasters to spread operational costs (traffic, accounting, production, rent, etc.) over more properties, thus making the overall enterprise more efficient. This, in turn, results in more flexibility with ad rates. Broadcasters have been pruning staff on an ongoing basis to make sure their stations both maintain profit margins while remaining cost competitive with others stations and media.

Another implication of broad ownership is the resurgence of syndication, albeit in a very different form. In the days of “mosaics” and various other CRTC programming regulations, a number of independent syndicators prospered. With the easing of the restrictions, avenues for this sort of programming largely dried up. On the other hand, syndication firms such as Sound Source (owned by Standard) can prove to be a valuable resource for their parent firms.  They produce cost effective programming with a base of stations from their parent network already in place. The idea of a “Superstation” sharing programming is another popular experiment. Here, a format (e.g.EZRock) is developed by the flagship station in a group. From there the format and certain programming elements are rolled out to other members in the broadcast group. This allows the advertiser to focus on certain targeted features and maintain a consistency from market to market.

One of the most ambitious examples of the brave new world of syndication or networking has been CHUM’s creation of the “Team”,  Canada’s first Sports Talk Network. They boast affiliates in 9 key centres….Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver, Ottawa, Kingston, Kitchener, Peterborough, Winnipeg and Halifax. Costs are applied over a broad market list, affording the sort of programming which might normally be cost prohibitive for an individual market. Ads can be purchased on both a local and national basis. Sadly, the network has not yet been able to generate sufficient audience or revenue to make it a success. CHUM has recently announced a restructuring with somewhat less centralization and more emphasis on local content.

So, while buying space in radio may be somewhat more complex than in days gone by, the combination of superior audience data, targeted group buying opportunities, exciting programming experiments and consistently substantial audiences is making the experience more rewarding than ever.

(Published in "Marketing Magazine")



The closest I'll ever come to the upper crust is the stale loaf in the back of my cupboard. All you'll find in common between Bill Gate's bank account and mine are the zeros. Still, I consider myself very fortunate. I've had the opportunity to be exposed to a good deal of great music and work with some outstanding artists. Like many of those people who share my passion for radio, it all started with a love of music. Money was never the motivator. Had Bill Gates concentrated on radio instead of computers, his bank account might more look like mine. But no matter. Canada has undeniably produced some of the world's great musicians and songwriters. The quality of artists that this country has produced is disproportionate to our size. And radio has, for the most part, served them well in the past. But the nature of the record business has changed dramatically. Very few new artists are being signed by major labels. At the same time, the formatic reality of most mainstream stations has made it exponentially more difficult to break new music. Where do we go from here?

I can't say I agree with those who complain about the complacency and lack of originality in the programming of mainstream stations. The charge is that these stations aren't challenging listeners in the way they should. It is true that the programmers are very careful not to give loyal listeners unfamiliar music. Still, those stations do an excellent job of giving their core listeners what they want in a well researched, polished and professional fashion. It would be arrogant to suggest that listeners aren't bright enough to know what they should want to hear. At the same time, this does prompt a dilemma. The number of CHR stations is diminishing, giving way to more gold based formats such as Jack, Dave, Bob, etc. Per Capita Hours Tuned for Teens as reported by BBM have declined dramatically over the last 4 years. Many young adults and older listeners who favour niche formats are disenfranchised.

We must always remember that garnering sufficient ad revenue is the determining factor in programming mainstream radio. Remember too that teen targets account for well under 1% of all ad spending. Similarly, broadcasters must develop broad reach stations in order to remain viable to advertisers. Hence, the number of Adult Contemporary stations targeting Women 25-54 with a very conservative music mix.

CANCON on these stations, while meeting the regulatory requirements, does very little to assist new or niche artists. Innumerable formats are left without voices. The primary result is having the likes of Celine Dione or Avril Lavigne move into ever higher rotation. It also benefits gold artists like the Guess Who. Still, in their current incarnation, the CANCON regulations do little to assist up and coming artists needing a break. That, after all, was one of primary reasons for their existence in the first place. While all of this is taking place, the record industry is in dire straits as it tries to reinvent itself. Without any airplay, many new artists have little hope of CD/download sales or drawing significant audiences to live performances.

The answer would seem to be fairly clear. The 3 satellite/subscription applications being heard by the CRTC in early November have generated enthusiasm, excitement and groundbreaking opportunities unlike anything we have seen in decades. Their goal is not to supplant mainstream radio, but to supply a cultural alternative which doesn't have to rely on the dictates of advertisers. Both listeners and musicians would be the beneficiaries of a reinvigorated playing field. Folk, alt country, comedy, roots, electronica, blues, bluegrass, opera, jazz, singer-songwriter and a good deal more will now be given a second look and listen. Since these new stations would be driven by subscription revenue, the need to be all things to all people vanishes. Instead, the stations can strive to exist on their own terms, offering listeners something truly unique.

One of the most exciting opportunities which satellite brings about is the opportunity for Canadian artists to be broadcast to the lucrative U.S. market and ultimately, to the entire globe. I think back to the golden days of influential CKLW which was credited with breaking Canadian artists in the U.S. The new satellite applicants are both programming all-Canadian stations as well as producing Canadian programming for the existing U.S. based stations. Never before have we had an opportunity like this. If playing CANCON to Canadians is beneficial, then playing CANCON to the world is a windfall. Cultural exports will afford our artists significantly increased touring opportunities and CD sales. Most importantly, artists with absolutely no chance of mainstream airplay will now have vehicles in Canada and beyond. Listeners that crave a wider selection of formats will be rewarded. A much broader mix of cultures will be represented.

My answer to those dissatisfied with the status quo is that the answer doesn't lie in trying to re-format or re-think existing mainstream stations which continue to do an excellent job. Instead, the solution seems to lie with broadening our horizons both formatically and geographically. I may not have much money, but I, for one, find the wealth of these new musical options more rewarding than anything I have heard in years.

4:12pm, Thursday, Aug.14, 2003:

As we fight our way through another workday, we're dealt a T.K.O…….lights out. My computer, normally a powerhouse in an increasingly mechanical world, sheepishly shrugs and offers an impotent “no comment”. I turn to my television which offers nothing more than a blank stare. All around us, everything that is supposed to be hot is getting cold and everything frozen is thawing. Elevators, as if stuck in purgatory, refuse to go up or down. Stoplights have gone colour blind and motorists, timidly creeping along, are left wondering which way to turn. How do we make sense of all of this? The next newspaper is a couple of days away. Then I turn on my car radio and everything starts to come into perspective. Radio is delivering some serious energy.

Yes, the blackout, while causing countless problems, somehow reminded me of how special radio can be. How, with its immediacy and local character, the medium plays a unique role in our lives. This doesn't, in any way, denigrate the vital daily contribution of television, print and the internet. It's just that when I turned to those familiar radio stations I felt connected and in touch. Caller after caller offered updates and moment to moment anecdotes. Rather than seeming like some grand synopsis of the situation, it all seemed very personal. I felt like I could call in at any time and join the conversation. It was real drama with no artificiality. This was a group of neighbours setting aside pretensions and speaking openly with one another. The sense of community spirit was palpable.

Station after station turned on a dime and adapted their programming immediately to deal with the crisis. While a few were knocked for a loop with transmission problems, many made the switchover almost seamlessly. In particular, the talk stations came through. In Toronto, MojoAM640 (loved that Jimmy Cauchon), the CBC, and CFRB were on top of the situation. After a hiccup due to the loss of power, 680News was simulcast on sister stations CHFI-FM and the FAN590. Each delivered the breaking news in their own unique way.

As darkness fell, I was huddled around the radio with my children. This was something a bit different for them, being charter members of the cable TV/Playstation 2 generation. But there we were, hanging off of every word. How many people were stuck in elevators? Was all of this caused by terrorism, lightning, or some sort of a technical glitch? How long will it last? What stores are open? Where can we get gas? Is there chaos on the roads without any traffic lights? Callers answered all of these questions and more in no nonsense terms.

We heard about the frustrated young lady who happened to be in the middle of her first driving lesson when the chaos broke. We heard about good Samaritans taking it upon themselves to direct traffic while others handed out bottled water to passers-by. Another saw something disturbing in the sky, only to realize that, without any neon lights, she could actually see the Milky Way. Cut-ins from the deputy mayor and the police chief. And all the while, hosts directing the conversation with both a sense of drama and of humour.

I am often asked why local content seems to be so critical to radio. For the average listener, the local weather, traffic, news, humour and personalities mixed in their favourite type of music provide company and a connection to the community. Delivered with immediacy, these elements combine to make the medium unique. Something listeners can personally identify with. Many wear their favourite stations as a badge of honour or identification. Moreover, take all of those local elements away and you could make do with your own CD collection. That is a challenge that national satellite stations or international web stations have to face. In fact, BBMM analysis has time and again shown that given two similar music formats, listeners will almost always choose the inmarket stations over that of a spill station.

I can reflect positively on the recent situation because the tragedies were few and far between. People, for the most part, behaved admirably under trying circumstances. I am still surprised by that. But most of all I was reminded that radio has the power to deliver some serious energy.



(Published in "Broadcaster Magazine")



Shockwaves were felt throughout the land. A prophet came down from the mountain clutching programming commandments written in stone (which looked peculiarly like BBM diaries). After a tasteful pause for a commercial message, he issued a proclamation from the radio gods. “Thou Shalt Have A New Format and its name shall be *****". It seems that while everyone was in agreement on the nature of this new sound, the people at CHUM thought he said “BOB". After some brief reflection, the people at Rogers were pretty sure he said "JACK". Lastly, the people at Corus are certain he said "Dave". Thus was born the divisions among believers in the new format sweeping the country.

While the above may be an overstatement of how earthshaking the new programming trend is, this unconventional approach is certainly making its presence felt across Canada. And it would appear listeners are taking notice and tuning in. At the same time, a series of other formatic shifts are taking place, changing the ever evolving sonic landscape. As players carve out their own niches, everyone is hoping for a bigger piece of the pie.

The godfather of JACK is Sandy Sanderson, Executive Vice President of Programming for Rogers nationally. A little over 10 months ago, he and his team decided to revive their AC franchise in Vancouver with a dramatic change in sound. KISS-FM was caught up in a perennial battle with soft rocker 103.5QM-FM and wasn't gaining any ground with the core female 25-54 demo. After considering various options, the first JACK was born on December 27, 2002. The playlist, which is three times normal size, boasts an eclectic mix of pop from the 80's, 90's and beyond. The station proudly rejects listener requests and concentrates on "playing what we want". Irreverent splitters feature such things as the station filing listener requests with the sound of a toilet flush. Results were immediate and dramatic with the station jumping from 4.3% share of hours tuned (A12+) in Fall '02 to a 10.7% share in Spring '03 and a 12.7% in Summer ‘03. The female/male split is approx. 51%/49% and the age emphasis is on the lucrative 25-54 demo.



  % Share of Hours Tuned
  (Mon.-Sun, 5a-1a)
  Source: BBM Summer 2003
  A12+ A12+ A12+ W25-54 W25-54 W25-54 M25-54 M25-54 M25-54
  Sum. '03 Spr. '03 Fall '02 Sum. '03 Spr. '03 Fall '02 Sum. '03 Spr. '03 Fall '02
Toronto                  
CISS-FM 3.5 3.6 4.9 5.7 2.9 3.8 4.6 1.6 3.2
(JACKFM)                  
Vancouver                  
CKLG-FM 12.7 10.7 4.3 20.5 17.4 7 19.7 16.7 4.6
(JACKFM)                  
Calgary                  
CKIS-FM 19 3.5 4.8 24.5 3.2 3.3 27.1 2.6 1.6
(JACKFM)                  
Winnipeg                  
CFWM-FM 9.8 10.5 11.2 15.8 17.6 21.1 13.2 14.6 14.8
(BOBFM)                  
Ottawa                  
CKKL-FM 10.9 7.6 10.1 17.6 11.7 10.9 15.4 6.7 7.5
(BOBFM)                  



Promos proclaim "If you haven't heard about the new station in town, you don't know Jack". The promotional tone for Jack has been tastefully irreverent and consistently playful. Campaign details include prizes of Cracker Jack, life sized posters of a Jack Ass, Jack-in –the-Box TV creative and a series of in your face splitters. It seems some listeners are tired of being told how valuable their requests are and embrace this brash approach. Maybe this explains why so many women say they like "bad boys".

But before there was Jack, there was Bob. The recent trend (I'm still waiting for Tom, Dick and Harry) began in March 2002 with a CHUM owned Winnipeg station (CFWMFM) that flipped to an "80's, 90's and whatever" format positioned with the moniker Bob (99.9 BOB-FM). The format was the brainchild of Howard Kroger (Programme and Operations Manager). He sought to develop a sound designed for 30 somethings. His goal was to forge a psychological affiliation with the group caught between the Generation X'ers and Baby Boomers, giving them the music and attitude associated with their not so distant youth. The results were immediate and impressive with the station leapfrogging past the competition. Executive V.P. CHUM Radio Limited, Paul Ski, proudly points out that "BOB in Winnipeg has been number one in reach and share of hours tuned for adults 25-54 since its launch. CHUM has, in turn, flipped their Ottawa station KOOL-FM from Contemporary Hit Radio to BOB. By the way, no one has yet come up with an appropriate category descriptor for this format (is it gold?, AC?, hits of yesterday and whatever?). BBM is currently grappling with this dilemma, so don't bother checking the front of your book for an answer. In a market already rocked by change including the launch of HOT89.9, BOB came through in a big way for the Summer BBM, delivering a 17.6% share of Females 25-54. While they dropped some teens and very young adults, they more than made up for it in the 25-54 money demos. In recent months, CHUM has also rolled out the successful experiment to include their stations in London and Brockville.

The Rogers team adopted the new concept, renamed their newborn Jack, and encouraged even more irreverence. In fact Rogers, was so pleased, they ultimately repeated the experiment in Calgary, Toronto and most recently, Orillia. Not to be left behind, Corus has revamped their station in Cambridge and dubbed their incarnation DAVE.

The June 4 launch of Jack-FM in Toronto took place ahead of schedule. After hearing talk of a competitor adopting the format, V.P. of Rogers Toronto Radio Operations Chuck McCoy turned CHR station KISS92.5 around completely in a dizzying 27 hours. During the summer survey period, the station was without DJ's, leaning on a distinctive series of splitters to maintain the flow and deliver the image. Two notable exceptions involved having Dan Ackroyd and Meatloaf each serve as guest hosts for an afternoon. As Oct. 1 Rob Christie (last with JACK-FM in Vancouver) signed on as host of the breakfast show.

As a reward for his valuable contribution in Vancouver, P.D. of the original incarnation of Jack, Pat Cardinal, was brought in Sept. 8 to head up the Toronto operation as G.M. and P.D. Cardinal is remembered in T.O. as the man who brought Howard Stern to Q107. He likens Jack to Seven-Up, and its breakthrough campaign as the UnCola. He proudly points to Jack-FM as the unradio station with a format that breaks all of the programming rules and is rewarded with a loyal audience looking for a fresh approach.

Jack-FM's sales team, headed up by Lannie Atkins, have crunched thee numbers and are promising to steal 20-25% of the A25-54 ratings from each of CHUM-FM, MIX99.9, Q107, EZRock 97.3 and the Edge 102.1. While that wasn't the case as of the Summer BBM, the jury is still out awaiting the Fall numbers.

It is ironic (although I'll have to check with Alanis Morrissette) that one of the casualties of this new sound is new music. Both in Ottawa and Toronto, CHR/Top 40 stations have been flipped. The important thing to note is that well under 1% of ad buys across Canada are directed at teens. Conversely Adults 25-54 see the vast majority of ad revenues. Both KOOL-FM and KISS92.5 were doing solid jobs in their markets, but with increased competition for a niche that wasn't tremendously lucrative to begin with, they had little choice but to seek greener (i.e.$$$) pastures.

As is always the case, format shifts have a domino effect in a market as surrounding stations adjust their sound to protect their audience shares. This game has become all the more strategic with expanded corporate ownership of up to 4 stations (and more with spill stations) per market.

Rogers strategy with their flagship franchise in the Toronto market has been especially intriguing. The acquisition of FAN590 has given them a solid base of talk on AM with two distinctive male-skewed niches. 680News is both unique and consistent with an expanding cume and a loyal audience that checks in "3, 4, or 5 times a day". From a sales perspective, the station positions itself extremely well with business/financial community. On FAN590, P.D. Nelson Millman has done a masterful job of holding off the Team 1050 challenge and retaining a very loyal audience. Again, this distinctive niche allows for a very targeted sales approach which reaches far beyond boxcar numbers.

On the FM side, JACK-FM strives for a fairly even female/male split. CHFI-FM, the station which has frequently boasted the largest cume of any station in the country, is content with a female skew and a domination of office tuning. Still, all was not well in Paradise. With audience figures declining and the younger end of the demo slipping away, there was a need for some revitalizing. This new energy has come in the form of Julie Adam, recently named General Manager and Programme Director of CHFI-FM. Most recently Julie served as P.D. of KISS92.5 before the flip from its CHR format to JACK. Her formidable resume includes a successful history with Rawlco, with stints at Z99 in Regina and Energy 1200 in Ottawa. Her first order of business was to revamp the morning show, bringing in Mad Dog and Billie to replace Erin and Bob (who is now in the drive slot). Her goal was to develop a show that was both contemporary and "relevant" to current listeners. She continues to make programming tweaks with everything from the playlist to positioning statements and stylish splitters. Stay tuned to see how her programming savvy pays off.

The radio gods have spoken. All that remains for us to do is pick up the Fall BBM and find out who was listening.


For many broadcasters, agencies and advertisers, the end of August means pouring over a flood of fiscal end figures. In most stations across Canada, the same tune is echoing…..Show Me The Money! Perhaps it is time to go back to school and find out where all of the ad dollars are going.

The attached chart shows an estimate of national radio expenditures by demo from Sept. 1998 to July 1999. While a number of local buys lack a defined target, there is good reason to believe that these figures are roughly indicative of overall radio advertising activity. Given the current resurgence of CHR across Canada, I have broken out the percentage of buys which fall within the 12-24 and 12-34 core targets.

Per Centage Share of All Radio Buys for Target Demos*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Portion Falling

Portion Falling

Age

Adults

Women

Men

Total

Within 12-34

Within 12-24

 

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(Weighted %)

(Weighted %)

25-54

30.88

10.54

3.34

44.76

14.92

0

18-49

9.45

1.35

1.09

11.89

6.32

2.6

25-49

6.11

1.12

2.19

9.42

3.77

0

18-34

5.94

0.7

2.78

9.42

9.42

3.88

18+

4.00

0.02

0.82

4.84

1.31

0.54

18-24

1.52

0.01

2.16

3.69

3.69

3.69

35-54

1.33

0.49

0.52

2.34

0

0

25-64

1.38

0

0.02

1.4

0.35

0

25-34

0.1

0.04

0.74

0.88

0.88

0

12 to 24

0.77

0.1

0.03

0.9

0.9

0.9

35+

0.77

0.09

0.01

0.87

0

0

18-54

0.82

0.01

0.05

0.88

0.4

0.17

18-44

0.58

0.02

0

0.6

0.38

0.16

35-49

0.55

0

0.01

0.56

0

0

35-64

0.45

0.05

0

0.50

0

0

Teens 12-17

 

 

 

0.48

0.48

0.48

25+

0.29

0.03

0.16

0.48

0.09

0

25-44

0.25

0.03

0.02

0.30

0.15

0

12 to 34

0.11

0

0.06

0.17

0.17

0.1

55+

0.1

0.01

0

0.11

0

0

50+

0.1

0

0

0.10

0

0

Other (Religion,Farming,obscure demos, etc.)

5.41

0

0

 

 

 

 

100.00

43.23

12.52



As consumers’ media choices become more and more segmented, it will become increasingly important to establish dominance in a given niche. The days of being all things to all people are coming rapidly to an end. For now, Adults 25-54 claim an overwhelming share of ad dollars. So much so, that any station targeting groups outside that demo has often done so at its own peril.

One popular way of estimating a station’s potential revenue is to compare its share of hours tuned (A12+) to it share of market ad revenue. This simple ratio can be thrown out of whack by a variety of factors. To come up with a more accurate projection, we must take into consideration these variables and establish a power index, i.e. the multiple by which a specific station’s revenue share figures will over or under achieve its raw audience share figures. The variables which we must consider are:

Heritage:
Heritage stations will tend to outperform their overall share, especially on the retail buys where rating performance is less significant.

Core Target Demographics:
By far the most popular target group for advertisers is 25- 54 (44.76% of all buys).
Conversely teens are targeted in just 0.48% of all buys.
A station’s core demo relative to popular ad demos  therefore helps to determine a  station’s power index.

Niche Targeting:
This is becoming increasingly important. A station such with strength in a demographic niche where there is a large investment of ad dollars for a certain category (e.g. young adult males and beer) will overperform. The importance of boxcar demo numbers is superseded by performance with a given product usage or lifestyle category. For example, an all news station will tend to get a good deal of financial business that can drive significant overperformace.

When looked at from an advertiser’s perspective, there is a tremendous opportunity to target Teens and Adults 55+ with relatively little competition and very efficient rates.

It remains a mystery as to why more advertisers don’t target the older demo more intensely. This group often has significant discretionary income to spend on dinners out and other quality of life items. The traditional image of cash poor senior citizens who need a price break is simply not being borne out as the affluent baby boom bulge moves up the demo scale.

Another key area which has been woefully underanalyzed  is ethnic background. In Vancouver and Toronto, this component is especially important. Ethnicity is often far more important age when determining product usage and lifestyle choices. Again, it all comes down to niche targeting.

Having discussed the question of how radio’s allotted revenues are divvied up among stations, we must now ask how is the media doing overall? In the buoyant economy of the last couple of years, radio has been faring quite well. Still, sitting back in a self-satisfied fashion could be a fatal mistake. In this so-called boom period, radio’s growth is slower than overall ad growth. Radio has slipped to under 10% of all ad revenues. Let’s put this in perspective by saying radio (at about $900 million/year) is consistently underperforming the yellow pages. Now let’s talk about the $100+million revenues for the internet next year. Expect that figure to grow exponentially. You don’t need JoJo’s Psychic Hotline to tell you what investors think of radio-only stocks versus internet based stocks. The conclusion is simple. If, as a radio advertiser/broadcaster/supplier etc. you are not exploring and exploiting your radio- internet connections, I’ll give you the number of a good psychiatrist…he’s been waiting for you.

Have a great fiscal. Come next September, when someone shouts “Show Me The Money”, I want to see a number of you smiling as you point to the vault.

 










Welcome to the new Hennessy & Bray Communications web site. With due deference to the technologically irrepressible Mr. Gates, it seems like the perfect time to examine the Windows of opportunity that the Internet is affording advertisers, broadcasters, and marketing people in Canada.

Fans of a science fiction future just have to look over their shoulders. It’s all around us. My four-year-old son is demonstrating proficiency with computer skills at an age when I was doing little more than drooling. As the new BBM RTS study points out, 1,834,688 people aged 12+ in Toronto actively search the web for information. Now think about the hundreds of millions who will be linking up around the world over the next few years. Check the stock market if you want to know where the excitement for investors is. Tell them you want to buy a radio license (please… no letters from the CRTC) and listen to the sound of a slamming door. Conversely, talk about your far-fetched web project and watch wads of cash waft in your direction. Take a look at the recent record trading of excellent stocks like bid.com or broadcast.com and it’s obvious which way the wind is blowing.

Consumer media has essentially undergone 3 major eras. The Industrial Revolution brought with it mass communication and the newspaper era. The 1920’s brought about the age of broadcast with all of its enticing immediacy. Increasing technological sophistication brought us video. We now sit on the cusp of the Internet era. Here, media connects with the consumer at his/her convenience. We still have newsrooms, mailrooms, offices, libraries, etc. The difference is that they exist in new forms suited to the whims and wants of consumers. In era of increasing fragmentation, the consumer won’t be willing to be told when to tune in. The broadcaster better have programming sitting at the ready for when the customer calls.

Advancements like streaming audio/video from RealAudio have made broadcasting to the world a reality. This new environment has a variety of benefits. No license required. No content regulations. No borders. No transmitters. Absolute audience tracking accuracy. The ability to supply extra information simultaneously. Weather, song lyrics, stock prices, an advertiser’s product information, you name it. And listen to this radio people…..you are playing on an even field with your television brethren.

Email is far more than a priority post for letters home. The distribution of commercials/CD’s etc. can be accomplished quickly, easily and inexpensively with such technologies as Liquid Audio or the infamous MP3 encoding. No need for satellite or DCI.

It is clear that fragmentation will heavily impact on media consumption habits.

The question is, when will the consumer demand some sort of consolidation or one stop shopping? Something as simple as leaving a message has become cumbersome. Check your email, then your office voicemail, your faxes, the receptionist, then check the clock……it’s time to go home. And that is nothing compared to your media choices. How would you like it served up? Via cable (regular or ISDN lines), satellite, antenna, VHS, DVD, CD or the internet (through streaming audio/video)? I’m sitting here surrounded by electronic devices and so many clickers that I don’t know which direction to point in. It seems logical that we will turn to the brains of the operation, the computer, for an answer. It should be a matter of time before the television, radio, stereo, gaming systems and recording devices are centralized in a multi-tasking computer, preferably with something better than a mouse on which to (double)click.

While some stations have wisely begun to take advantage of this new world by broadcasting over the web, we haven’t yet scraped the surface of possibilities.

Think about how many stations have their web site listed as part of a promotional budget. It will soon make more sense to think of a radio station as a promotional expense for the related website. Broadcasters can use the airwaves to draw them in and get them online where the potential for interaction is so much greater. For those thinking of networking or syndicating your programming, the net is an instant international network. Give the shows to conventional broadcasters free of charge. They are effectively airing a commercial for your website.

One of the most important aspects of the new technology will be the ability to broadcast without geographic limitation. As the multicultural mosaic becomes an increasingly important part of our society and the marketing process, widely spread communities can be unified. Native people have already begun using  internet broadcasts to great advantage, bonding tribes that are geographically spread out in small, remote pockets. Look for Chinese, Italian, South Asian, and Portuguese internet broadcasts to become popular. For marketers facing the problem of segmented media consumption, this is a unique solution whereby they can achieve excellent reach against a target with similar habits/values. Aside from cultural considerations, the possibility of unifying lifestyle groups can be particularly appealing. Perhaps a certain group isn’t sufficiently large in any given market (particularly smaller markets) to warrant their own programming. But, when taken en masse across Canada, voila. Gays, teens, Christians, etc. This potential is virtually untapped. Those who try to hang on to broad demos (e.g. Adults 25-54) until the last possible moment will ultimately be segmented out of existence.

Research becomes much simpler when consumers are connected to your website. Forget about focus groups. They are already on the line. The accuracy in terms of hit counts is tremendous.

While it is true that the number of websites is huge, it is equally true that a select few sites are doing most of the business. 75% of web surfers go to 50 sites or less. The key is registering properly with search engines such as Yahoo and developing affiliations with sites that attract large numbers of hits. The Motorola site, broadcast.com, is a prime example of a well constructed site. Start there and link to just about any need you have. Go shopping and bid on any product imaginable, buy CD’s, watch live TV, listen to live radio broadcasts, get newsclips, information, or just chat with people. This kind of all encompassing site is a starting point for a wide number of people who share roughly similar lifestyle tastes. By controlling the jump off point, you speak to people before the inevitable fragmentation takes place. Bill G. might say that it is like controlling the windows through which people look at the world.

I think I’m beginning to see the light.
"The first cut is the deepest ……" I will always be amazed at how profoundly we are affected by the first songs and stories we hear over the airwaves. How our first experiences continue to resonate year after year. Those who have, in some small way, been touched by radio find themselves reaching out to it when the whole world seems out of touch. Whether it’s just to hear a news story, a song that somehow moves us, or finding out about a traffic jam up ahead. Maybe it’s a joke of the day or light-hearted banter that makes the drive to work a little more bearable. Radio is something we take personally. I’m not talking earth-shaking influence. It’s power is more subtle, but equally pervasive.

It is in this light that I look at recent events and upcoming decisions that will undoubtedly change the direction of the industry. As you may have noticed, each passing year leaves me somewhat more sentimental. Somewhat more determined to find consensus and compromise rather than conflict. And for this unabashedly emotional perspective I make no apologies. In-fighting can only damage the credibility of the medium. Stations or groups that attempt to sell themselves by attacking competitors just shoot the industry in the foot.

Radio faces indisputable challenges. Ones that can only be addressed by a combined effort. The Fall 2003 BBM saw a continuation in the dramatic decline in Teen Hours Tuned as evidenced by the following:

A12-17 Average Hours Tuned per Capita (Total Canada)
Fall 2003 Fall 2002 Fall 2001 Fall 2000 Fall 1999

8.5       9.4       10.1      10.5      11.3


That’s our future choosing to tune out. We have to find a way to remain relevant as everything around us changes. If we expect listeners to remain loyal, we have to demonstrate that we are listening to them.

In the past year, the collective response to a number of occurrences has underlined the power of radio. The Halifax hurricane, the Ontario blackout and the B.C. forest fires all offered up demonstrations of how important radio can be to a community. Station after station turned on a dime and adapted their programming immediately to deal with the crisis, delivering some serious energy. Amber Alert is yet another example of how radio’s immediacy can make a life and death difference.

Still, it is addressing the audience’s day to day needs in an ever changing world that will make the ultimate difference. More varied programming options, improved fidelity, display features, and interactivity are just some the features that audiences will demand. And radio must deliver if it is to remain relevant in an increasingly complex world. Standing still is simply not an option for a medium that prides itself as being the best option for those on the move.

A number of firsts are headed our way this year. The CRTC is convening their overall review of radio in an attempt to map out the road for the future. Look for policy shifts the likes of which we haven’t seen for decades. The future of DAB (Digital Audio Broadcasting) clearly appears to rely on the introduction of DAB exclusive stations. Being a high tech replacement technology is good, but not enough. Soaring DAB receiver sales in the U.K. (over 400,000 since June of last year) has demonstrated the importance of DAB exclusive stations in addition to the greatly improved fidelity and data display features. Radio Canada/CBC has introduced the first such station with its news/weather/traffic station in Montreal. Look for some very progressive thinking and a number of exciting announcements from them in the near future. Sur Sagar will go on air in Toronto this year with its multilingual station targeted at the Southeast Asian community. A number of other such applications are currently before the CRTC. Ultimately, the joint efforts and cooperation of broadcasters will be critical to garnering widespread consumer acceptance and a viable business model for DAB in Canada.

The introduction of satellite radio now seems probable. Sirius has found an enthusiastic partner in the CBC while a few of the private radio groups are rumoured to be joining ranks with the somewhat larger XM for the upcoming hearings. Satellite offers a new national dimension and valuable niche programming options which enhance the listeners experience without diminishing the vital day to day contribution of local broadcasters. There has even been some discussion of combined AM/FM/DAB/XM satellite receivers. Again cooperation is essential for the survival of the industry.

I have seen some exciting examples of the new generation of radios boasting enticing bells and whistles. For example, the pause and rewind on the new Intempo PG-01 is addictive. Its 10 minute buffer allows you to rewind in 10 second increments to rehear the traffic report you missed and to listen to that favourite song again. Others will record programming and save it as an MP3. Digital sound is mind blowing and data display extremely handy. These are but a few of the technical advancements which will keep radio viable in an increasingly competitive multimedia environment.

From a business perspective, our research tools are better than ever. BBM’s single source qualitative diary information along with RTS (which delivers an unparalleled national sample size of over 50,000) offer detailed product usage/psychographic/demographic data which is invaluable in selling radio’s targeting capabilities. Unfortunately it is sometimes poorly understood and under utilized. As an industry we have to work together to change this. Moreover, we have to deliver ad creative that touches the pulse of target listeners. Whether we are talking about programming or advertising, there is only one critic who matters…the listener.

In the end, we should never forget that radio doesn’t belong to the corporate name on the license. It can’t be bought or sold. It will always belong to the child who listens with a sense of wonder to his or her bedside radio late at night. And to those of us in which that spirit will always live on. I can’t know whether or not and in what form the medium will survive. But I do know that I will stay tuned for as long as I can.

(Published in "Broadcaster Magazine")


Where do I turn? That may have been the refrain coming from many of Erin Davis’ faithful listeners after she left CHFI-FM, but we now have an answer. Starting on Tuesday Sept. 7, in what will surely be a perfect fit, she will be co-hosting the morning
show with Mike Cooper on EZRock97.3.

The station recently asked listeners to phone or email their choice for a substitute while Christine takes maternity leave. The
overwhelming favourite came as no surprise. Erin made a lot of friends in the 15 years she spent hosting the morning the CHFI-FM morning show. In fact, she has received over 3,500 personal emails from listeners who have sought her out to say they feel like they lost a friend. And I happen to know that she took the time to answer every one.

P.D. Brian Depoe declared that “we are thrilled to have someone of Erin Davis’ calibre join the EZRock team”, confirming that he would also welcome her huge fan base. Since leaving her previous post, Erin has hosted her own show on WTN which is
currently in reruns. She is now looking forward to a full time return to radio.

In spite of corporate consolidation and networking, radio continues to be about community and human contact. The medium continues to touch people in a very personal way on a day to day basis. Erin has never forgotten the fact that she is a small but important part of listener’s lives, waking them up and cushioning their drive to work. She enthusiastically describes her ongoing goal of giving listeners “something they can relate to”, something more than just “chatter”. Think of it as a comfortable conversation between friends. Well she has just given them something new to talk about.

Welcome back Erin.



You might say satellite radio received a warm reception at the Sept. 8 bash held at
Toronto’s Mod Club. A star-studded crowd attended the early evening affair hosted by
two of the subscription radio applicants slated to appear at the CRTC hearing beginning
on November 1st. The Sirius/Standard/CBC team joined forces with the Canadian
Satellite Radio/XM group to espouse the benefits of satellite radio in Canada for listeners,
artists, and members of the retail and music industries. The prevailing sentiment appeared
to be “license us both and let listeners decide”.

The show started out with a song from promising newcomer Kathleen Edwards who,
before performing “a song they won’t play on the radio”, commented “if they don’t play
me on satellite radio….then I’m fucked”. Following her came a rousing endorsement for
satellite radio in general from well-known American journalist Bob Lefsetz.

Next up, members of CSR/XM (Bob Mackowycz, Stephen Tapp, John Bitove) and the
Sirius/Standard/CBC (Gary Slaight, Michele Tremblay, Kevin Shea, Jane Chalmers)
teams spoke to the industry crowd and answered questions. The theme was “Satellite
Radio: The Next Step in the Evolution of Radio”. Speakers touted the fact that satellite
radio in the U.S., with approx. 3million subscribers, has experienced quicker adoption
rates from consumers than any other media product (e.g. cable TV, satellite TV, MP3
players, VCR’s, etc.). More importantly, the speakers answered potential critics with the
arguments that Canadian “artists and niche formats that wouldn’t normally receive
airplay on traditional stations will be heard by a much wider audience, both across
Canada and in the sizeable U.S. market”. They pointed to new revenue streams for
Canadian artists as well as the $40 million in Canadian Talent Development Funding.
Lastly came the discussion of avoiding the “grey market” problems encountered by
satellite television. Party goers left with kits from each group and requests to provide
letters of support.

Where we all go from here is up to the CRTC. But it was clear from the line of empty
martini glasses that radio fans are having a good time getting there.

(Published in "Broadcaster" Magazine)

The illustrious history of broadcasting in Canada all started in December of 1900 when
Reginald Fessenden of Quebec first transmitted the human voice. That makes radio older
than that fuzzy food item wrapped in tin foil in the bottom of my refrigerator.

Fessenden’s exploits were followed up my Marconi’s first transAtlantic signal between
England and Signal Hill, Newfoundland. Even when considering all of the things
invented by human beings, this development has to stand out as magical. By 1919 the
first broadcast license had been issued to XWA Montreal (later CFCF). In 1922, 34
private commercial stations across Canada were licensed. In 1925, John Logie Baird sent
the first live transmission of a human face via television. Of course, even magic requires
a sponsor. So…. the introduction of broadcasting was followed by the advent of
advertising and competition for ad dollars.

In today’s age of consolidation, competition between broadcasters is hotter than ever.
Still, there remains one body that is a bastion of cooperation for the collective
good…..BBM Canada, which is currently celebrating its 60th anniversary. The concept
for the Bureau of Broadcast Measurement was jointly developed by the Canadian
Association of Broadcasters and the Association of Canadian Advertisers which produced
and sponsored radio programmes and therefore required reliable information about the
number of people listening to those shows. As the print industry moved to develop
quantitative readership information it became obvious that radio would have to provide a
"value" for the media they were hoping to sell.

BBM was officially born in May of 1944, as a non-profit tri-partite co-operative of
broadcasters, advertisers and agencies with the mandate of providing high-quality,
impartial measurement of radio audiences in Canada, at the lowest possible cost to all
concerned. The first BBM survey, released in October 1944, was conducted by the
private ratings company Elliott-Haynes using an unaided mail ballot. Instead of checking
stations from a prepared list, participants compiled their own lists of stations to which
they had listened. By today's standards the forms, which asked that listening be reported
"by household" as it related to only two day parts (daytime and after 6 PM) seem very
rudimentary. There was a simple request that a member of the family identify themselves
by gender and indicate if they were over or under 21, reporting that someone in the
family listened to individual radio stations once, three times or daily during the week.
This was reported on a county by county basis across Canada.

Later, BBM records note that "premiums" were sent out with each "ballot" as recompense
for the respondent's efforts and cooperation and in order to assure a high percentage
return. In fact the "premium" was a package of safety pins. It is also interesting to note
that the initial membership fees for broadcasters were $25 per year.

These surveys gradually increased in frequency from once every two years to once per
year and in 1956, to twice per year. Today, with the recent changes made by the
Extended Measurement Committee, BBM will report radio audiences 4 times per year.
In 1952, BBM introduced its television measurement service when the CBC established
its first two TV stations. Today BBM has over 100 TV station members.

The same year, BBM began producing time-period ratings for radio and television using
a panel-diary method pioneered in Canada by International Surveys Limited. The new
surveys were initially conducted every spring and fall with each member of participating
households keeping a week-long diary of listening and viewing by half-hour periods. At
the same time, the circulation surveys were increased from every other year to twice a
year.

In 1964, BBM became the first ratings service in the world to introduce computerized
sample selection. It also increased the number of surveys, redesigned the bilingual
household diary, and switched its premium from a card of safety pins to a 50-cent coin.
An important step was taken in 1967 when BBM decided to switch from household
diaries, which had usually been kept by the harried home-maker, to personal diaries sent
to selected members of households---including children, although their diaries were filled
out by an adult. This change increased the response rate for mailed diaries to almost 50%
and facilitated the acquisition of demographic data. Within a few years, BBM became the
only audience measurement service for radio in Canada, and in television the competition
was reduced to Nielsen. Between 1963 and 1968, BBM increased its membership from
357 to 534 or about 90% of the broadcasting industry, including the CBC.

Unlike the original household diary, the new personal diary was used for both radio and
television, largely for reasons of cost. In theory, however, the most reliable diary is the
single--medium personal diary. In 1975, therefore, following several studies and
considerable debate, BBM adopted separate diaries for each medium, including different
samples and survey dates. This move greatly increased survey costs, however, so that in
the mid-1980s BBM implemented household flooding or saturation sampling for both
radio and television. Ironically, this development brought BBM almost full-circle back to
its original household diary technique and illustrated the fact that audience measurement
methods generally are determined as much by economic considerations as by the
requirements for scientific validity.

In the early days, the BBM Board was comprised of 3 advertisers, 3 agency
representatives and 3 broadcasters. By the 1990's, the BBM Board consisted of 14
members: 4 representing radio stations, 4 representing TV stations, and 6 Buyers - (4
representing advertising agencies and 2 from advertising companies). Reporting to the
Board of Directors were two Executive Committees developing policy which they
recommended to the Board. The radio committee (REC) consisted of 18 members, and
the TV (TVEC) committee, 21 members. Both consisted of broadcasters, agencies and
advertisers.

Today, the majority of the funding continues to be supplied by Broadcasters. Of course,
in the ongoing debate, advertisers are quick to point out that the funding broadcasters get
comes from the advertisers.

In recent years, BBM has continually upgraded the quality and usefulness of its research.
Single source qualitative information has allowed for extremely targeted analysis,
planning and buying. In 1998, BBM introduced RTS, which after starting off in three
major Canadian markets – Toronto, Vancouver and Victoria, has grown into the largest
syndicated consumer study in Canada with over 60,000 respondents and coverage in 11
major markets as well as regional and national data. With a release every six months
covering, 11 Canadian major markets, this “return to sample study” includes over 70
questionnaire pages covering every major consumer category.

After a period of extended development in cooperation with Arbitron in the U.S.A.,
BBM introduced the PPM meter. Implementation of the television measurement system
in Montreal has been extremely successful and rollout in other major markets is expected
in the relatively near future. Tests have also been done on radio listenership with these
devices using the same panels.

In 2001, with an eye toward increasing public visibility, BBM adopted a new name and
logo and is now officially known as BBM Canada. Along with this goes a PR campaign
designed to increase awareness of BBM and the services it offers.
Throughout its various incarnations, BBM has consistently displayed professionalism and
integrity beyond reproach. When there are errors, they are quickly corrected. When a
member violates policy, it is dealt with in a fair and impartial fashion. There is an
ongoing effort made to keep improving service and methodology while remaining
extremely cost effective. Best of all, BBM is living proof that competitors and
representatives from different sectors can work together in a constructive fashion for the
collective good.

Happy anniversary BBM. Here’s to many more years of valuable service.
The radio industry in Canada has a rich and evocative past as well as a reasonably profitable present. As we stumble forward looking for the future, perhaps we should keep our collective ear to the ground. Is it possible that we are hearing a warning signal?

For those of us that love radio, it is given that the medium will always be an important part of our lives. And I’m not talking about income. We revel in the memories of hearing those AM top 40 hits that captured our imagination, got our adrenaline running and our hormones racing. Or maybe it’s the progressive or alternative rock on FM that helped us find our identities and feel alive. “What a rush….what a feeling”. Or new music….”the spirit of radio”. The news and talk shows that kept us company, kept us informed, made us angry, made us want to call in, made us think. The memories are entrenched and the value of the medium is taken for granted.

This is an era of consolidation and fiscal responsibility. Overall, both profit margins and station values are quite good. Not up to dot com boom standards but far better than dot com bust. Consumers in key demos are still treated to some outstanding programming. While down a bit in the Spring 2002 BBM, average hours tuned per capita for Adults 18+ is still about 21.2 hours/week. With a figure like that, it is hard to argue that radio is not an important part of peoples’ lives. The female 25-54 demo in particular is superserved with all manner of adult contemporary stations. No problem there. The question is, what about the next generation?

The medium is doing a fairly good job of holding onto what it had. AM stations have retained a great deal of loyalty from Adults 55+. In particular, the reach for AM with those 65+ (Men 64.2%/Women 63.3%)* is better than FM (Men 54.4%// Women 52.4%). We have every reason to believe that FM stations will hold the 35+ group as they age.

Now…… take a look at teens (12-17). Weekly average hours tuned per capita over the last three spring books have fallen from 11.7 in 2000 to 11.0 in 2001 to 10.1 in 2002.

Could this be an anomaly? How could our children be forsaking the magic medium?

With less than 1% of all radio buys going against teen targets, this is not an immediate problem. But if we do not address this situation, it will become a BIG problem. The internet has been an innovative source of entertainment. MP3’s, file sharing (let’s leave the politics of this issue to another article), streaming video clips, network games and much more. Television has been delivering some excellent niche oriented content for teens and young adults. MuchMusic, Vibe, Much Loud, etc. Quality, in-depth, around the clock programming catering to all the whims, fashions and fantasies of youth. Then you have the new video game consoles….Xbox, Playstation, Gamecube. Excellent quality with enough titles to fill all of a teen’s free time. The video game industry continues to post astounding revenue figures. The movie industry continues to deliver blockbuster films for the 12-24 demo with opening weekend grosses sufficient to turn any radio sales manager green with envy.

This isn’t to say that there aren’t some first rate Contemporary Hit Radio Stations in Canada. Given the limited revenue sources for young demos, it would be unreasonable to expect many more such stations. So how do we capture the imagination of today’s teens/young adults given the immense amount of competition for their attention? Interactive station web sites with creative promotional extensions are a good start. Here radio stations have a chance to tie together a number of their audience’s interests (movie reviews and trailers, game reviews and links, streaming audio, music clips and CD reviews, contests, etc.). DAB (Digital Audio Broadcasting) has the potential to make a significant contribution. With CD quality sound and a display delivering all sorts of ongoing info (and ultimately pictures), you have the sort of high quality multimedia device which teens demand. Add to that the fact that some of the new receivers offer such features as the ability to record on-air programming and store it in MP3 form.

Now we’re talking.

These initiatives are a good start, but one thing remains certain. Radio can’t rest on its laurels. Heritage means little or nothing to those who haven’t experienced it. They won’t have those cherished memories. If we don’t grab their attention now, those average hours tuned for teens will keep dropping. Then, as they age, it will be very difficult to win their loyalty back.


*Source BBM Radio Data Book 2001-2002
Published in Broadcaster Magazine


(Published in RadioWorld)

A new wave is sweeping over Canada in what will become a defining moment for radio broadcasting. With their approval of three subscription licenses, the CRTC issued an emphatic yes to new technologies which Chairman Charles Dalfen, in a  crystal clear (you might say digital) fashion, declared “will help to give Canadian talent exposure to listeners across Canada and indeed, North America-both through new Canadian channels and airplay on U.S. channels.”

The first critical step took place last November with the CRTC hearings in Ottawa/Hull at which 3 satellite/subscription applications were presented. These included the XM/Canadian Satellite Radio and Sirius/CBC/Standard satellite proposals along with the CHUM Ltd./Astral terrestrial/DAB offering.  In the room was a who’s who of Radio in Canada. The lobbying for intervention support leading up to all of this was intense. So much hand shaking took place that few people in the radio or music industries were left with shoulder sockets in tact. After that came the hand wringing as everyone awaited the decision which was over 7 months in coming.

If I was a sports reporter I would call this a home run for satellite. Still, as we forge toward the launch dates, a good deal of debate continues.

Canadian content (CANCON) has been the pivotal issue being discussed during this entire process. In a uniquely Canadian fashion, the fostering of Canadian talent is always a major consideration for the commission when granting broadcast licences. Both satellite applicants pointed to the fact that they will embrace niche formats, new music and emerging artists, giving them the opportunity to reach all of North America. CHUM, with its terrestrial based system (in Canadian major markets only), focused on their pledge to adhere to the current CANCON regulations for traditional broadcasters.

The satellite radio applicants don’t see themselves itself as being in competition with conventional radio, but rather as a compliment to it. One that offers cutting edge niche programming that mass appeal stations can’t afford to deliver. The presumption here is that rather than cannibalize tuning to existing traditional stations, satellite will help to revitalize listeners and increase overall tuning to the medium, weaning attention away from video games, MP3 players, etc.

The artists/musicians/comedians with whom I have recently spoken are equally enthralled about the satellite broadcasters' commitment to new talent and niche formats as well as the opportunity to reach the U.S. market. Many major Canadian artists including Daniel Lanois (producer of U2, Bob Dylan, Peter Gabriel), Robbie Robertson, Ian Thomas, Colin Linden and Jeff Healey have spoken out in favour of satellite in Canada. Behind the scenes, Canadian Satellite Radio confirms that production on high profile features has begun with a number of these artists. As well, building of the technical infrastructure is underway.

Certain industry groups (ACTRA, etc.) have launched an appeal of the decision to the cabinet of the federal government, perhaps in hope of negotiating some further concessions. Past history indicates that the chances of such an appeal being successful are slim to none. The satellite applicants seem to be undeterred. John Bitove (President and C.E.O. of Canadian Satellite Radio) says he expected resistance to the CRTC ruling, and that won't stop CSR from pushing ahead with plans to launch its service by Christmas. “I think some of (the coalition's members) have vested interests with existing broadcasters and some of the status quo, in terms of the Canadian broadcasting industry,'' he said in an interview. The fact of the matter is that tens of thousands of independent artists are behind satellite radio because of the new-found exposure it will mean for them ... as well as the hundreds of millions of dollars in funding it will mean to Canadian artists and musicians.'' For his part,  Kevin Shea, President & CEO of Sirius Canada remarked that “the commission has worked hard to give us a reasonable and creative framework within which we can move toward providing Canadians with an outstanding programming line-up.”  Wall Street’s fears that Canadian content restrictions might deter satellite’s launch appear to be unfounded.

One minor sticking point for Sirius was the decision that re-broadcasting of existing services in their entirety (such as the Sirius re-broadcast of CBC services) would not be permitted. “At least 50% of the programming on each of the 8 channels… (must be) original Canadian programming”.

The CHUM/Astral group, which was hoping to have exclusive access to the subscription market, responded quickly to the decision. Paul Ski, Executive Vice-President: Radio, CHUM Limited said “we are extremely disappointed with the Commission's decision…..It is unrealistic to expect that an all-Canadian service such as ours can compete with undertakings whose channels are 90% U.S. originated.” CHUM representatives have repeatedly said that they would not launch if all three applications were approved. Most industry pundits agree that it would be economically impractical for CHUM to attempt to launch given the cost of producing 50+ channels and the formidable satellite competition. Equally important is the fact that auto manufacturers have said that they won’t support the CHUM platform, leaving them to concentrate on the portable/home market alone.

Following on the heels of the U.S. experience, auto manufacturers are chomping at the bit for satellite in Canada. Michael Grimaldi, president of GM Canada issued a statement saying “without doubt, satellite radio is the biggest advancement in mobile audio technology in the last 60 years and we plan to present it (Canadian Satellite Radio) in our upcoming models.” That puts satellite in the driver’s seat.

In addition to being factory installed in new vehicles, satellite radio will soon be widely available at audio retail in Canada. Receivers by Polk and Yamaha allow for integration into your home stereo. It is also available through numerous manufacturers such as Sony, Alpine, Pioneer, and Panasonic, for dashboard install to rejuvenate your car stereo. Perhaps the most vibrant sector of Satellite Radio equipment is in the portable and plug and play category. These devices can interface with your car stereo through wireless FM modulators, they can hook up to your home stereo unit through a hardwired cradle and some simply plug into a boombox for true portability. These devices are currently manufactured by Delphi, Audiovox, Pioneer, and Tao.

All eyes were on the number of satellite subscribers in the U.S. which is currently over 5 1/2 million and growing rapidly. Retailers are eagerly anticipating the added benefit of revitalizing the radio receiver industry at retail.

Listeners and artists alike have been demanding change and they are, in all likelihood, about to get it. The radio industry (and it would appear the CRTC) is listening to them. Canada is about to tune in to the future.